The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

History lessons from Karbala

By Hassan Abbas Share

The idea of defiance against tyranny and oppression owes a great deal to Hussain ibne Ali, the hero of the battle of Karbala in 680 AD. With just 72 valiant followers and family members, the grandson of Prophet Mohammad faced the military might of the Muslim empire ruled then by a despot, Yazid bin Mu‘awiya. Hussain refused to sanctify Yazid's reign through baya'a (allegiance) and consequently, he and his small contingent were martyred in the most brutal of fashions. The accompanying women and children were imprisoned for months in the dark alleys of Damascus.

On every Ashura, the 10th day of the Muslim calendar month of Muharram (which fell on December 6 this year), many Muslims all across the world commemorate Hussain's great sacrifice, but tragically the central message ofKarbala appears to evade the broader Muslim thinking today. In Western literature and research on Islam, this episode is often viewed through the lens of certain Shi'a rituals practiced on and around Ashura. It is worth probing why that is so. Even more importantly, it is critical to understand why terrorists and extremists like al-Qaeda andthe Taliban often attack the Ashura related gatherings (as is evident from attacks in recent years in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan), and what is at the core of their disdain of all the things that Imam Hussain stood for.

A brief historical reference is required to understand the context of Ashura.After Prophet Mohammad's death in 632 AD, the expansion of Islam became a global phenomenon, courtesy of a variety of means. Islam was a rising power in theworld, but in the process, the fabric of Muslim society was also being transformed, as the Muslim outlook was gradually influenced by people from various cultures. New elites that were more interested in power and wealth alone started emerging as more influential, and consequently, Islam's emphasis on egalitarianism, justice and equity started getting diluted. A deliberate attempt to imitate the dynastic empires of the Byzantines and Sasanians was obvious to many observers at the time. The distortion of Islamic ideals became a favorite pastime of Yazid and his coterie. The expansion of influence by way of the sword was a hallmark of his times.

Imam Hussain, the spiritual custodian of Islam at the time, staunchly stood against this shifting tide, and his unprecedented sacrifice was intended to shake the Muslim conscience and expose the misleading path introduced in the name of Islam. It was a matter of principle for him - one of human dignity and honor. Challenging the newly introduced monarchical system of government was another important feature of this struggle. In his last sermon before departing from Madina on his journey towards Karbala, Iraq, he made clear his mission: "I seek to reform the Ummah of my grandfather." An armed struggle for that purpose was never his intended route. He believed in conveying the message through love and compassion. It was a message motivated truly by humanity. The great Indian leader Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi aptly acknowledged this by saying: "I learned from Hussein how to achieve victory while being oppressed."

This was not a mere political battle, though some Muslim historians try to project it that way so as to cover up not only Yazid's atrocities, but indirectly to defend his school of thought as well. The mainstream view, however, both among Sunni and Shi'a Muslims, is very sympathetic toward Imam Hussain. It would be an absolute travesty of Muslim history to call this a Sunni-Shi'a battle. Some writers still do that, either out of lack of in depth understanding, or in a flawed effort to simplify things for a lay Western reader. On the Muslim side, only a handful of controversial clerics project this version.  Still, most Muslims shy away from digging too deep into the matter, and carefully avoid questioning the historical developments leading to the rise of Yazid.

Insightfully, the whole narrative of tragedy at Karbala would have remained unheard of without the tireless struggle of Hussain's sister Zainab ibne Ali, who as an eyewitness of the tragedy propagated details of the event far and wide among Muslims. While in chains, she courageously challenged Yazid's policies on his face in his court in Damascus soon after the battle at Karbala. Many Muslims -- some out of ignorance and others out of bigotry -- avoid appreciating the crucial role of a woman in this grand struggle. Zainab's contribution to fighting for the essence of the Muslim faith was as critical as that of Hussain.

Though Shi'as are often at the forefront of commemorating the tragedy of Karbala, Sunnis, especially those belonging to the Barelvi school of thought in South Asia and almost all Sufi circles in broader Asia and the Middle East, also enthusiastically participate in paying homageto Imam Hussain and his companions. Extremists and terrorists among Muslims want to destroy this element of unity, as sectarianism suits their divisive and violent agenda. Distorting religion to make it dogmatic in outlook and regressive in approach is also what helps them achieve their goals exceedingly well. For them, political power is an end in itself. Hussain's message stands completely contrary to this perspective.

The attack on Shi'a Muslims observing Ashura in Kabul on December 6, which killed 55 people, was a manifestation of the perpetrators' perverse worldview. Next door in Pakistan, where this threat is more pronounced, a heavyprice (in the form of terrorism and violence) is being paid for ignoring the expanding tentacles of religious extremism. Though things remained peaceful on Ashura in Pakistan this year, the Kabul attack was claimed by a splinter wing of a banned Pakistani sectarian group, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi(LeJ). Authorities have yet to uncover solid proof ofwho was responsible. Irrespective of whether the Afghan Taliban was directly involved in this specific attack or not, their policies during the ‘reign of terror' in Afghanistan (1996-2001) indicate that they hold similar views toward those who honor the martyrs of Karbala. Taliban massacres of ethnic Hazara Afghans (of whom the vast majority areShi'a Muslims) in the late 1990s are a case in point.  The curse of sectarianism has inhibited spiritual growth of many Muslims.

The remedy to the malady lies in mainstreaming the message of Karbala both within the worldwide Muslim communities and among those who are interested in deciphering the foundational themes of Islamic discourse. At a higher level, Hussain's message of defiance against oppression and personal sacrifice for the cause of humanity is applicable for a broader audience for generations to come.

Dr. Hassan Abbas is a Senior Advisor at the Asia Society and the editor of Watandost blog. He is based in Washington D.C.

MOHAMMED SAWAF/AFP/Getty Images

 

BINA

9:03 PM ET

December 11, 2011

Thought provoking

Thank you for this outstanding article - very informative, thought provoking and above any sectarian differences. I am pleasantly surprised that a mainstream US magazine has published this piece.

 

SHAAMYL77

12:51 PM ET

December 12, 2011

Introspection

Than you Dr.Hassan Abbas, the article is not only thought provoking but provides guidelines for introspection to all the Muslims, whether Shia or Sunni. Most of the Muslim population believes in the sacrifices of Imam Hussain, across the board throughout the world. You have correctly pointed out that it is just a bunch of people who are using sectarianism as a weapon to further their ulterior motives. I myself being a Sunni, strongly condemn violence in the name of Islam and religion. Islam, otherwise being the religion of peace and serenity, is being projected as religion of terror, which is no true on any account.

 

LALKA

3:53 AM ET

December 15, 2011

Disgusting

I am shocked by the blatant lying and propaganda that has been published without any editorial input. I urge everyone to read the Shia books and see the bigotry and hate-filled teachings. They are the only ones who teach Cursing as core part of their religion. Taqiyyah is another major Shia pillar. Oh, and the infallibility, where they say their Imams are more innocent than the angels and free from sin, even if they commit genocides. What a crappy insane ideology!

 

BINA

7:53 PM ET

December 15, 2011

In response to Yazid's Supporter

You are a victim of the curse of sectarianism. The article is above any sectarian undertones and exposes those bigots who challenge the message of Hussain in the name of Islam. Reference your biased questions, read the most credible book about Shias in English language:

Shi'ite Islam by Muhammad H. Al-Tabataba'i and Seyyed Hossein Nasr (State University of New York Press, 1979)

 

LALKA

7:31 AM ET

December 16, 2011

In response to a Shia terrorist

@Bina

I don't need any reference books -- ironically written by shia extremists -- since I know the hate-filled ideology in your holiest books including Usul Kafi and Nehjul balagh.

Cursing is a major pillar of shism and in itself is a major insult to humanity. So is the horrible concept of infallibility.

It is bigots and fanatics like you who need some education. The story around Karbala needs to be researched thoroughly, keeping in mind the hollowed concept of Imamate and divine "ownership" of holiness that runs so deep in shite cult.

 

MARINKANOVA

3:50 AM ET

January 9, 2012

Most of the Muslim population

Most of the Muslim population believes in the sacrifices of Imam Hussain, across the board throughout the world. You have correctly pointed out that it is just a bunch of people who are using sectarianism as a weapon accidentlawyers to further their ulterior motives. I myself being a Sunni, strongly condemn violence in the name of Islam and religion.