Friday, October 21, 2011 - 4:44 PM

This is the second installment in a series contributed by researchers from the World Organization for Resource Development and Education (WORDE) as they traveled throughout Pakistan to explore how civil society is countering extremism at the grassroots level.
...
In a pristine, remote valley in Kashmir, far from the theaters of war, some families are abandoning their religious and cultural traditions in favor of extremist ideologies. The trend began after the 2005 earthquake, when several Islamist organizations - notably Jamaat ud-Dawa (JuD) - came to the forefront, providing food, shelter and health supplies to devastated communities. A village elder lamented, "Many of us were impressed by their sophisticated ambulance services, and families willingly joined in their relief efforts." Most of these families had no idea that JuD was in fact a front for the banned militant organization, Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Pakistanis, particularly in such remote areas, require tools to recognize extremist ideologies and terrorist organizations so that they can create counter-movements within their own communities. We travelled throughout Northern Punjab and the Hazara region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to learn how certain grassroots organizations have designed effective awareness campaigns within a religious paradigm that are palatable even to the at-risk population.
We began with the leaders of Pakistan's moderate religious networks. Since 9/11, dozens of religious scholars have issued public statements and fatwas against terrorism. Dr. Raghib Naeemi -- son of Dr. Sarfraz Naeemi who was killed in 2009 after he publically denounced terrorist activities as un-Islamic -- appears regularly on TV to promote peace and social cohesion.
Traditional Muslim networks have organized nation-wide anti-Taliban public rallies from "Save Pakistan" to "Ulema and Mashaikh" conventions, bringing together religious scholars and community leaders. Last November, a "Long March" was organized from Islamabad to Lahore to protest the increasing number of suicide attacks on Pakistan's cultural and spiritual landmarks. Over 20 major shrines across Pakistan were bombed last year alone. One of the core organizers of the Long March explained, "As we proceeded, the participation grew by the thousands, and in every city, we gave speeches and handed out fliers teaching people how to recognize extremism."
Religious leaders have also developed rapid response mechanisms to denounce terrorism following major suicide attacks. Last year when the soup kitchen at the shrine of Lahore's patron saint was bombed, the imam Mufti Mohammad Sialvi invited the media and mobilized leaders from different mosques to condemn terrorism. When we visited the shrine a year later, we found that students groups had maintained the campaign with freshly painted banners.
To form a stronger unified voice against the Taliban, religious scholars have also created a number of new NGOs. In the rural outskirts of Rawalpindi, Pir Mudassir Shah, a dynamic young leader versed in 14 languages, established the think tank Center for Innovative Research, Collaboration and Learning (CIRCLe). Pir Mudassir was a prominent organizer in a 25,000 man National Flag Day march to demonstrate support for the military counterinsurgency operations in the Swat Valley. The march brought together various elements of civil society, from conservative Muslim groups to the Christian Progressive Movement of Pakistan. CIRCLe will soon launch a poster campaign, for which they are seeking international support. One of the posters features a girl crying with a caption: "The Taliban Took my Father."
Schools are another critical channel through which Pakistanis generate awareness. Our journey took us to Bhera, an ancient village known for its classic Mughal mosques, Hindu temples, and carved wooden balconies. Deep in the heart of Punjab, Bhera's Dar ul-Uloom Muhammadia Ghousia is the hub of a network of educational and social welfare institutions providing free education grounded in the Sufi ethos to over 25,000 women and men. Pir Amin al-Hasanat, who leads the school, explained, "We teach all of our students that it is not their duty to fight jihad, but to look after the wellbeing of their community - regardless of one's faith or ethnicity." Just last year, the school and its affiliate philanthropic and social welfare organizations distributed hundreds of hygiene kits, established medical facilities for over 7,000 people and rebuilt homes for flood victims. They targeted remote areas at risk of falling under the influence of radical groups who use relief as a means to win recruits.
We encountered other successful models. The Pak Turk International School system has campuses throughout Pakistan, including volatile regions like Quetta and Peshawar. Their teachers challenge radical narratives by providing students and their families the necessary tools for interfaith dialogue and mutual understanding, which allow them to deconstruct the tribal, cultural, and religious stereotypes that feed militancy. Successful counter radicalization, we were told, is not taught in a specific class or manual but rather by example. In the Pak Turk schools, teachers are available at all times for guidance, and visit students in their homes. Through these civil society efforts, Pakistanis are becoming aware of the dangers of violent extremism. According to recent public opinion polls, a greater number of Pakistanis have a negative view of al-Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban than before. "At first people were hesitant to speak out against the Taliban," explained Pir Mudassir Shah, "but now they are becoming more comfortable challenging extremism because the issue is mainstreamed." Today, while barriers and police checkpoints can be seen lining the streets of Pakistan's capital, and the army mobilizes in the tribal belt, a parallel war is being waged in Pakistan's heartland by local communities.
In one instance in rural Abbottabad, not far from the compound in which slain al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was living, a group of radical mullahs offered to build a mosque on the condition that the clerics could provide their own teachers. Not long after, families were alarmed to see that their children were being radicalized in classes taught at the new mosque. When parents learned that their children were being taught that "J" stands for "jihad" and "K" for "kalashnikov" the community held the mosque under siege until the mullahs were forced out.
150 miles south, in a village near Bhera, a father learned that his son was being brainwashed by a fundamentalist community member to believe that he would enter paradise if he became a suicide bomber. The father, supported by the Dar ul-Uloom community, rescued the children by publically exposing the radical mullah. He challenged the mullah: "After sending my child to paradise, why don't you send your own son to join him so that mine won't be lonely?"
Even some segments of the population that had been involved in militancy are now condemning extremism. Irfan, a former "toll collector" for a militant outfit along the Pakistan-Afghanistan Durand Line explained, "After the Taliban bombed the shrine of the Rahman Baba, the great Pashtun poet-saint, I realized that militants are destroying our country." Now as a taxi driver, Irfan makes it a point to lambast the Taliban in conversations with all of his passengers.
Waleed Ziad and Mehreen Farooq are leading a project to analyze the role of Pakistan's civil society in countering extremism for the Washington DC-based World Organization for Resource Development and Education (WORDE).
Arif Ali/AFP/Getty Images
Illusive peace-loving Pakistanis
Wow! If only Secretary Clinton would have read this Farook/Ziad baloney, she would have NO need to visit Pakistan yesterday and today ever peace-loving Pakistan!
Nobody told Previous US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan about these peace-loving Pakistanis when she wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will NOT abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.
Is there anybody in Pakistan who can tell Pakistani people that their own Army and Intelligence with the blessings of Pakistan’s democratic government, are SPONSORING Islamic fundamentalists led by Osma bin Laden’s Al Qaeda, Haqqani’s HQN, Mullah Omar’s QST and Hafiz Saeed’s LeT?
Did Lawyers (of all the people) really shower rose petals on the assassin of Punjab governor when he arrived at a Pakistani court. As he left the court, a crowd of about 200 sympathizers chanted slogans in assassin’s favor?
Did more than 500 clerics and scholars from the group Jamat Ahle Sunnat said no one should pray or express regret for the killing of the slain governor?
Did the group representing Pakistan's majority Barelvi sect, which follows a brand of Islam considered moderate, issued a veiled threat to other opponents of the blasphemy laws?
Did the group warn in a statement that "The supporter is as equally guilty as one who committed blasphemy," adding that politicians, the media and others should learn "a lesson from the exemplary death"?
Where O’ where are these peace-loving Pakistanis when one needs them?
living in delusion and denial is you! You cannot accept the bitter reality that Pakistanis as a society are fighting against extremism at the grass-roots level and that your hate-Pakistan mission increasingly stands on shaky grounds..
One wonders if you have an intelligent bone in your body at all.. You obviously have nothing to say regarding the topic instead of peddling your anti-Pakistan bigotry any way you can.. In any case, wherever you copy-paste your nonsense, you will find my response pasted in kind. Enjoy!
Spewing lies consistently doesn’t change the facts on the ground. There exists NO evidence that Pakistan facilitated OBL’s relocation from Sudan to Afghanistan. Claiming to do so without citing irrefutable evidence goes to show your utter anti-Pakistani bias that you constantly peddle in every single Pakistan related article here on Foreign Policy.
Bruce Riedel? Who really takes Bruce Riedel seriously apart from the bureaucrats who have been working on the so-called Af-Pak American policy for years now and have gotten nowhere with their ill-conceived notions of success in the region! Taliban didn’t come crashing to Earth from Mars; they were the same ‘jihadi Frankenstein monster’ that the Americans (CIA) & Saudis created and funded to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.. Pakistan merely re-organized them to quell the Afghan civil war that had erupted post Soviet departure and American abandonment of the region. Obviously, Riedel is too ashamed to admit some cold hard facts.
NO one in Pakistan ever says that whatever methods of implementing its own foreign policy objectives Pakistan employs is because of lack of development or lack of education, etc. The methods that Pakistan employs are a direct result of American intransigence regarding Pakistani interests in Afghanistan. How does putting terrorists of Northern Alliance (Taliban competitors bankrolled, financed and armed by India) in to positions of power in the puppet Afghan gov’t of Karzai help Afghanistan prosper? The performance of Karzai's stooge govt is for all to see.. bribery, corruption, feudal lords stacking looted cash from national coffers in Dubai and Swiss accounts while ordinary Afghans suffer!
Your ignorance is starkly visible from your statement, "Should India create terrorist outfits to terrorize Pakistan and take it over because India feels sandwiched between China and Pakistan".. this is sheer ignorance in the face of the fact that India has consistently financed Northern Alliance to counter Taliban in Afghanistan. Let’s not forget that these Northern Alliance terrorists were regularly supplied with finances and arms/ammunition via Indian forces base/outpost in Tajikistan that also includes an air-field. India doesn’t even border Afghanistan, so why all this jostling for influence?
Surely, Pakistan will do what it can to root out India’s nefarious designs in Afghanistan wherever and however possible. It’s a legitimate security concern for Pakistan that borders Afghanistan and it should come as NO surprise. Come 2014, the Pashtun majority, who support the Taliban by and large will make their influence felt in Afghan politics one way or another – which has thus far been sidelined by the current Afghan govt which is staffed by a plethora of minority Uzbeks, Tajiks, Hazara, etc who peddle the interests of their masters in India and by extension their benefactors in the United States.
Surely your nonsensical narrative of events from cherry-picked information couldn’t more deviant from the actual ground realities. Yes it is wrong that some sections of the Pakistani society celebrated the killing of Salman Taseer and venerated his killer. So what? Big whooping deal! Which society doesn’t have right-wingers? A simple look across the border in India will reveal how much love fanatic Hindus have for the guy who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi and who decry Gandhi as a traitor and a Muslim-lover. Need I say anything about the Tea-Party in America? The delusional likes of Sarah Palin and/or Michelle Backman? Bottom line is, the killer has been sentenced to death and the court’s decision is resolute in punishing a criminal of his magnitude. Simple as that.
Ofcourse Pakistani parliamentarians passed a resolution condemning U.S unilateral action against OBL on Pakistani soil.. Hardly any parliamentarian (except those from the religious far-right) had any issue with OBL being killed. Ofcourse OBL is hero to some just like Anders Behring Breivik , the Norwegian killer is a hero to many right-wing Europeans who rejoiced in the killing of innocent ‘Muslim-lovers’ and ‘left-wing softies’.. What does this point raised by you prove? Absolutely NOTHING. What almost everyone in Pakistan, not just the parliamentarians, had a problem with was U.S flagrant violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty. That is a legitimate and understandable grievance. Your rants to the contrary are nothing but an exercise in rhetorical polemic with very little substance.
In your condemnation of Pakistan’s elected parliamentarians and labeling them as somehow pro-OBL, you forget to mention that most of the Pakistani population today regards the regime of Asif Zardari as nothing but a puppet of the United States in its continued support for American operations in Afghanistan via intelligence sharing, military cooperation, etc. Hence the dichotomy in your argument is fully exposed.
To date, no concrete evidence exists of ISI’s current support of Haqqani or anyone else.. Opinions, assumptions, conjecture by this official or that official, whether it be Anne Patterson or Adm. Mike Mullen; its all about political maneuvering to put more pressure on Pakistan by making an scapegoat in the failed saga of American adventurism in Afghanistan, which after a decade, still has no certain end. Here’s some refreshing information (excerpt) for you from TIME magazine’s recent report:
…’ But Thomas Ruttig, a co-founder of the Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN) and expert on the Haqqani network, thinks ISAF may be crowing over very little…’ , Ruttig of AAN, says, "It is difficult to prove that the ISI is behind, or advises in, particular operations of the Haqqani network, or, for that matter, other Taliban subgroups or other terrorist organizations. Often, reports about the Haqqani network or other organizations' involvement in certain attacks remain unclear. This is still the case in the latest attacks." For what it's worth, both the Pakistani and Taliban spokesmen have denied that links exist between the ISI and the Haqqani network.’ Courtesy TIME
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2096545-1,00.html
You got one thing partially right – Pakistan will not abandon its interests for any amount of money. Only way to seriously engage Pakistan in a constructive manner is to listen to what it says. Wind-up the endless Indian consulates popping up everywhere in Afghanistan and limit Indian influence in Afghanistan to a legitimate minimum as would be required to conduct the ‘good’ work that Indians are doing in Afghanistan as per their claims. Negotiate with the Taliban (which the U.S is doing off and on but trying to outflank Pakistan in such negotiations – another misstep and height of foolishness) and other such concerns. Then only will Pakistan respond positively and favorably and do what it can by using any leverage, if there, it has over any sort of militants.
Your comments in every other Pakistan related thread are highly ignorant and have very little logic or understanding of the complex situation that involved Afghanistan-Pakistan region. I am extremely tempted to think that you are nothing but an alternate user I.D of another user here on FP who goes by the name ‘DRKUCHBHI’. May very well not be the case but surely, you both have nothing better to do than regurgitate the same anti-Pakistan bile again n again.
Marty this is the typical prejudiced mentality of yours - which is illusive.
Irrespective what is written about Pakistan, keep on propagating against Pakistan -
Lies, lies and more lies to be-fool readers that you are telling truth.
Even Goebbels must be feeling ashamed in his grave,
Have some iota of shame and at least use your actual hindu name - don't be afraid of yourself by hiding behind a Western names.
People are much wiser than you think to buy your idiot thoughts.
After decades spent diligently in process of Acute religious Radicalization , promotion of self defeating Jingoism based on regional hate and using violence as foreign policy, the make will take a long time.
Writer looks too optimistic about the immediate gains while not touching upon the motivations of following such self destructive violent path for so long.
What is being termed as foreign and unwanted was in fact pursued by rulers of Pakistan and they are still on the same path.
Micro level efforts in villages and communities will not lead to much difference, when the Macro level objectives and goals remain fanatically same.
Former Indian Ambassador to Pakistan Mr. G. Parthsarthy knows the Pakistani Terror Terrain like back of his hand.
Following article throws light on various Pakistani actors, their acts and script they religiously follow and improvise.
Rogues who run Pakistan:
Excerpt about ISI role in 9/11
Throughout the hijacking of IC 814 in December 1999, the Taliban was guided by ISI handlers who took charge of the three terrorists released by us. One of them, Omar Syed Sheikh, proceeded to kill American journalist Daniel Pearl. Shortly thereafter, with the help of the then ISI chief, Lt General Mahmud Ahmed (later sacked at the instance of the Americans), Sheikh transferred $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, the leader of the 9/11 hijackers. Maulana Masood Azhar, another recipient of Indian generosity during the hijacking, soon met Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar in Kandahar and organised the December 13, 2001 attack on our Parliament.
http://www.dailypioneer.com/pioneer-news/edit/12882-rogues-who-run-pakis...
Here's to hoping they succeed.
________
Please check out our blog - www.globalbearings.net
We are currently running a 4-part VIDEO series on Pakistan - first part is on the rise of the Pakistani Taliban, second coming today on the Punjabi Taliban, MORE coming soon. Check it out!!
We also carry daily updates of weekly global news roundups to help save you time and carry analyses on all important global events.
www.globalbearings.net
I know that the photo was probably not picked by M/s Farooq & Zaid. But I hope the average reader does notice the picture of Mumtaz Hussain Qadri on one of the posters that says "Proud of our Army". And no, gentle reader, these peace loving anti-taliban protesters are not condemning the murder of Salman Taseer, the Governor of The Punjab because he said people of other faiths should have human rights. The peaceniks in this picture are celebrating the murderer. Maybe we should all move to India or ship all the crazies to Afghanistan - that's how we can have peace.
What do Pakistanis think of their army?
Interesting comment on a great (and heartening) post, Badvacation. I'm assuming here that you're Pakistani, and from your comments, a moderate. Given that, what do you, and others like you, think of the Pakistani military? Do you consider it a necessary and good force? Or a necessary evil, which is fighting extremism in the country, even though it is itself fairly corrupt?
I'm an Indian and a moderate - which, contrary to what most Pakistanis think, is by far the majority in the country. And our priority is our own country and our own lives - making money, finding a place to live in our increasingly expensive cities, fighting bad roads and corruption and malnutrition - and Pakistan, like it or not, is extremely low on our to-do list.
We have no intention of invading Pakistan, which is what Pakistanis seem to fear the most. I believe that's what your army has been telling you, because that's the only way it can stay in power. You believe that you need a strong army, plus the ISI and its games in Afghanistan, because you're under threat from India, and that a strong army and the militant shadow war are the only ways a small country like yours can face up to a big, dangerous bully like India. That's a belief that needs to die before Pakistan can know real peace.
Remember, we've never attacked Pakistan. And even your nukes - our nuclear programme started after the 1962. In response to China, with no relation to Pakistan. We're not your enemies. You'll have to fight extremism and paranoia at the same time - in effect, fight the radicals and bring your army under civilian control, instead of the other way round. In India, the army has no say in the ruling of the country. We love our jawans to bits, but they aren't the government. That's something you need to try, too.
You had a great economy at one point - what happened to it? Pakistan doesn't have to be a failed state, but it has to change its mindset before it can move on.
These people have a lot of courage doing all the things they do. There is also the other side, where they religious beliefs are a little bit crazy and they overreact. I have a colegue of mine at the bank i work and we argue a lot about this practices
Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done. There are many infos on tv about manifestations like these. They will never stop...anyway...
Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. I've seen on other sites other pictures and really impress me. Thank you However I am experiencing issue with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting identical rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
The Pashtun majority, who support the Taliban by and large will make their influence felt in Afghan politics one way or another – which has thus far been sidelined by the current Afghan govt which is staffed by a pc tips plethora of minority Uzbeks, Tajiks, Hazara, etc who peddle the interests of their masters in India and by extension their benefactors in the United States.
Writer looks too optimistic about the immediate gains while not touching upon the motivations of following such self destructive violent path for so long. Ofcourse Pakistani parliamentarians passed crocs black friday a resolution condemning U.S unilateral action against OBL on Pakistani soil.. Hardly any parliamentarian (except those from the religious far-right) had any issue with OBL being killed crocs shoes. the Governor of The Punjab because he said people of other faiths should have human rights.
(12)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE