Friday, May 27, 2011 - 7:54 AM

Editor's note: today is my last day writing the AfPak Channel Daily
Brief. Beginning next week, my colleague Andrew Lebovich will be writing
it full time. Thanks for reading! --Katherine Tiedemann
A harsh attack
Yesterday,
a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber reportedly drove a pickup truck with
some 1,000 pounds of explosives into a barrier outside a district
police station in the northwest Pakistani town of Hangu, killing as many
as 36 and wounding 60 (DT, AJE, ET, NYT, AFP, Geo, Dawn).
There have been more than 20 militant attacks, killing almost 150
people, in Pakistani since the May 2 death of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin
Laden. Clashes between the Zakhakhel tribe and the militant group
Lashkar-e-Islam continue in Khyber, and warring Sunni and Shia tribes in
Kurram reportedly agreed to a ceasefire, even as four more were killed
yesterday (DT, Dawn).
U.S.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the most senior U.S. official to
visit Pakistan since the May 2 raid in Abbottabad, is in Islamabad for
meetings with Pakistani leaders, and commented to reporters, "Pakistan
should understand that anti-Americanism and conspiracy theories will
not make problems disappear" (BBC, Reuters, ET/Reuters, Post, AP, Dawn, AFP, NYT).
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen is also on the trip,
which is apparently designed to smooth over tensions with Pakistan.
Pakistani officials have reportedly made moves toward shutting down
three U.S. intelligence fusion cells in Quetta and Peshawar, which have
been used to coordinate operations on both sides of the border (LAT). It's unclear whether the moves are permanent.
On
a visit to Pakistan last week, CIA deputy director Michael Morell
reportedly negotiated an agreement for Pakistan to allow Agency
forensics experts to examine bin Laden's compound, which Pakistani
officials said had soundproof walls, using sophisticated equipment to
search for hidden compartments or buried materials (Post, Reuters, AP, CNN, Tel, AP, WSJ).
Documents that have already been taken from the compound reportedly
indicate that bin Laden discussed with his aides the possibility of
seeking a truce with the Pakistani state in exchange for protection (NYT).
And the New York Times examines a recent misunderstanding in the China/Pakistan relationship (NYT).
Leaky government
Regional
outlets continue to trickle out analysis of American diplomatic cables
released by the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks, with Dawn reporting
on the backroom reasons for the U.S.'s lack of displeasure at the
resignation of former attorney general Makhdoom Ali Khan in 2007, and
the Hindu describing the Pakistani government's house arrest agreement
with Pakistani nuclear proliferator A.Q. Khan (Dawn, Hindu).
David
Coleman Headley, the Pakistani-American who is currently testifying in
the ongoing trial of his self-described "best friend" and accused Mumbai
plotter Tahawwur Hussain Rana, said yesterday in court that he is no
longer proud of his role in the 2008 attacks (AFP, AP, Bloomberg, Globe and Mail).
Headley also said he had attended more than 50 sessions with Pakistan's
intelligence service in the run-up to the attacks, before which he
always briefed his alleged ISI handler, Major Iqbal, who used an
American cell phone to stay in touch (Hindu, Hindu, NDTV, WSJ). For more on the Rana trial, sign up for our sister brief, the Legal War on Terror (FP).
Speak softly
The
NYT adds to reporting about direct exploratory peace talks between the
Taliban and the U.S., with an Afghan official expressing skepticism
about whether the Taliban's designated representative, a longtime
personal assistant to Mullah Omar called Tayyab Agha, is still
particularly close to the Taliban leader (NYT, The News).
These talks have reportedly been held without representatives from
Pakistan, which is said to be involved in a parallel dialogue with the
U.S. and the Afghan government. NATO said it has arrested two suspected
members of the Quetta Shura, the Taliban's leadership council, in
Helmand (Pajhwok). Bonus read: Thomas Ruttig on history and prospects for reconciliation (NAF).
Eight
American soldiers and two Afghan policemen were killed yesterday in a
particularly deadly pair of Taliban roadside bombings in Kandahar, 12
miles from the Pakistani border, and a helicopter crash in eastern
Afghanistan killed one NATO service member (AP, AP, Reuters, LAT, NYT). And the Afghan government is reportedly struggling to spend all the donors funds it has been allocated (AP).
Title: The Raid? The Hunt?
Kathryn Bigelow, the Oscar-winning director of the Iraq war movie The Hurt Locker, has gotten the green light to make a film about the hunt for and eventual death of Osama bin Laden (Guardian, NYT). The as-yet-untitled movie is scheduled to be released in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Sign up here to receive the Daily Brief in your inbox. Follow the AfPak Channel on Twitter and Facebook.
Pakistan is suffering from self-inflicted wounds
When it comes to terrorism in Pakistan, Pakistan has invited jihadi violence upon itself. Pakistan is suffering from self-inflicted wounds.
Lawyers showered the suspected killer of a prominent Pakistani governor with rose petals when he arrived at court and an influential Muslim scholars group praised the assassination of the governor who was recommending to reform Pakistan‘s sharia laws.
The Pakistani parliament’s joint session convened on 5/13/11 after Osama’s killing, ended after adopting a unanimous resolution condemning the American raid on the Abbottabad compound in which al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden was killed.
Pakistani parliamentarians did not appear to be bothered about Osama living in Abbottabad for the past five years and perhaps in other parts of the country since 9/11.
Osama was a hero in Pakistan even prior to his death and remains one even now.
Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.
Nobody forced Pakistani Army and Intelligence to create what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called ‘this jihadist Frankenstein’ monster in 1990s. Pakistani Army and Intelligence chose to do so with the full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments at the time.
Is ’poverty, lack of economic development or lack of education’ a valid excuse to promote, spawn, shelter and support umpteen terrorist outfits on Pakistani soil?
Is ’wanting strategic depth’ a valid excuse to terrorize neighbors like Pakistan terrorizes Afghanistan and India or even take over a neighbor like Pakistan took over Afghanistan in 1996 and wants to do so again once U. S. troops depart? Should India create terrorist outfits to terrorize Pakistan and take it over because India feels sandwiched between China and Pakistan?
US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan, wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will not abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.
Now how can Pakistan feel threatened by ‘those domestically ensconced terrorist groups’ if Pakistani Army and ISI will NOT abandon them for any amount of US money as reported by ambassador Patterson?
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE