Behind the scenes of Raymond Davis's release

By Huma Imtiaz, March 16, 2011 Share

As March 16 dawned over Pakistan, perhaps no one except for the powers-that-be realized that Raymond Davis would soon be free.

Earlier in the morning, the Lahore Sessions Court had indicted Davis, a CIA contractor, for murder, after he allegedly shot dead Faizan Haider and Mohammad Faheem in Lahore this past January 27.

Hours later, the news broke that Davis was a free man, after he paid blood money to the families of Faizan and Faheem. According to Geo News, Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah announced that the families had forgiven Davis, and been paid blood money under the Shariah law of Qisas and Diyat. Another report aired on the channel said that 18 members of both families had announced in front of the judge in Kot Lakhpat jail that they had forgiven Raymond Davis, after which cash was handed over to the families. However, the families' lawyer Asad Manzoor Butt told Geo News that they were forcibly made to forgive Davis, after being led to jail by a man without identification.

Munawar Hasan, leader of the right-wing religious party Jamaat-e-Islami, reacted to the news by accusing the government of being slaves of the United States. "They should know that traitor governments do not last for very long," he said. "They have mocked the law, and the families were forcibly made to sign the Diyat document. Davis was involved with terrorist organizations, and yet they have let him go. The ISI claims to love the country, but they sell people to the States in exchange for dollars, they have failed in their love for the nation today." Hasan says protests against the release of Raymond Davis will be held in the major cities of Pakistan.

Conflicting reports have emerged about how much money has been paid to the families. Sources on various TV channels aired figures ranging from Rs. 60 million to Rs. 200 million (approximately $700,000 to $2,350,000). Davis's whereabouts are also unknown - Dunya News said he had flown to the United States, whereas Geo News claimed he had flown to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Another story attributed to "sources" on Geo News also said that Faizan's widow Zehra had allegedly left for the United States.

Ahsan Iqbal, member of the PML-N, a major opposition party in Pakistan headed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, told me in a telephone interview:

What has happened is between the families of the victims and the court and the law, if they have settled for the blood money under the law, then it is the law of the land. If the court has made a judgment we cannot challenge the judgement. However, it also shows that Davis didn't enjoy diplomatic immunity and his case was settled under Pakistan's law and not under the clauses of the diplomatic immunity.

Najam Sethi, a TV anchor and journalist, claimed on TV and Twitter that Punjab's Chief Minister and PML-N leader (and Nawaz Sharif's brother) Shahbaz Sharif had been involved in the negotiations between both parties. However, Iqbal denied the story to me, saying, "It has been very categorically clarified that Punjab government had nothing to do with the settlement, it is between the families and the accused."

Retired General Talat Masood, a defence analyst, told me that that Davis's release is a consequence of the smoothing over of relations between the CIA's and the ISI. "It's a good development, it demonstrates that both have come to an understanding about how they will operate with each other, and co-operate in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The ISI has also determined certain boundaries about how the CIA will operate in the country." Masood says that this was a difficult decision for Pakistan for many reasons, which include changing the Pakistan-U.S. relationship from co-operative to confrontational, and then dealing with the right-wing and religious parties' aggressive stance on Raymond Davis.

A senior security official in Pakistan, speaking under condition of anonymity, told me that, "The Americans had been working on this, they thought that this (the diyat law) was the only way out." And ISI and CIA relations? "The ISI has laid down their terms for reengagement of certain areas where they felt they'd been bypassed, and the other side realized that they needed them. Both agencies need each other."

While rumours and more conspiracy theories continue to swirl in the air, it is evident that Pakistan has emerged as the biggest winner from Davis's strange and sordid case. While the religious parties may cry themselves hoarse over sovereignty of the country and rule of law, the ISI in particular has the upper hand here, and has impressed upon the CIA to make it clear that they cannot run a network under the noses of the powerful spy agency. To use tennis lingo: Advantage: ISI. What happens in the next round is anyone's guess.

Huma Imtiaz works as a journalist in Pakistan and can be reached at huma.imtiaz@gmail.com

ASIF HASSAN/AFP/Getty Images

 

SAIF UR REHMAN

3:47 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Is Money more worth than honour......?

Who says Pakistan has come victorious of the event?
Its a field day for the religious parties and every comman man grieved of the release of a MURDERER. Government and the ISI lost their ratings further.

Was Raymond irreplaceable for CIA and they could not hire another spy?
no, they could. but it was the matter of their national respect that even their President involved in a pitty case of a spy.

What If America was told to forget about Ramand and look forward for the cooperation and improvement in relations.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

10:08 AM ET

March 17, 2011

America doesnt make a habit

America doesnt make a habit of leaving its own behind if it can help it. We also dont really care if the "innocent" men one of our operatives killed were actually members of an overly aggressive foreign spy service (ISI). Mr. Davis obviously made a mistake somewhere, but he felt threatened, he used his gun, and two men who were either criminals or ISI agents are now dead. Pakistan has just made such a big deal about it because it was a Christian killing Muslims, face it, that's fact. This event just gives Pakistanis an excuse to bust out those ole' burning uncle sam effigies , dust off those tattered burning American flags, and create some great poster art involving poor spelling, grainy photos of "raymon devis", a noose, and lets say... the words "death" and "American Devil". Yes, Pakistan certainly has its act together. And its populace is obviously highly educated and very reasonable. (feel free to read the above with a THICK slathering of sarcasm)

 

LATINO54

7:32 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Are such instances common?

What century are they living in? If one is rich in Pakistan they can kill anyone, pay money and be free? Is it in their laws that you pay $x and you get to kill someone?
Is the whole judicial system of Pakistan a big joke?

I find this shameful.

 

MARTY MARTEL

8:18 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Yes, this is Sharia law, joke or not

Not just Pakistan but most of the Islamic countries love to live under Koran's Sharia laws of middle ages even if they have so-called modern day democratic institutions.

That is why US-created Karzai government was forced to deport an Afghan for converting to Christianity because he was sentenced to die for that heinous act under Sharia law.

That is why a Pakistani woman was stoned to death for an alleged affair under Sharia law.

That is why a Christian priest was hounded in Malaysia for using the word 'Allah' to describe Jesus Christ since Muslims do NOT tolerate the use of the word 'Allah' to describe any other GOD but their own.

That is why there was the outpouring of support for the murderer of a moderate governor in Pakistan.

That is why so-called moderate Indonesian, Malaysian, Pakistani and West-created Iraqi and Afghan democracies impose death penalties on Muslims who convert to any other religion.

 

LATINO54

10:43 PM ET

March 16, 2011

@Marty Mertel - are you racist?

you seem to have ingrained hatred for approx 1/3 of the humanity. Get yourself checked!

 

BIGBROTHER

1:21 AM ET

March 17, 2011

Truth Hurts.

Everything Marty Martel wrote is true.
He not racist. Are you ignorant or just trying to be politically correct?

 

ABRARBUKHARI

4:27 AM ET

March 17, 2011

Marty Martel

Marty :

I hope you're doing well.

I have just read your comments. I would suggest you its better to study the whole philosophy of that religion you're criticizing.

Every one follow their religion as Muslims do. Does Christian dont have love for bible and Jews for their book??.

Once you go through the whole philosophy of the religion than you can criticize that better.

I hope you will understand and will develop patience in thinking & feedback.

 

ARYABHAT

7:22 AM ET

March 17, 2011

@ ABRARBUKHARI

Christian countries (say UK, USA. Norway etc.) do allow non-christians to carry their holy book (as you have mentioned other religions) in their country. WHY the Kingdom of Holy Mosque - Saudi do not allow it?

No study of religion can make a sane person understand a law that would perpetuate STONING of a woman for having Sex with someone she liked - her husband or not! That is what Sharia is!

You are trying to defend such barbaric law (Sharia) by efrfectively calling someone ignorant here. Suggest, try using reason to defend it! I am afraid you would fail!

 

ALIFAYYAZ

8:16 AM ET

March 17, 2011

instances of killing two in foreign lands aren't common

I am surprised at your naivety of looking at one side of the picture !!
how common is this in this century to go in foreign lands and kill two youths and then their spouses killing themselves for the irreparable loss !!!!

and you know what joke is , it is the same shariah that was made base to attack Afghanistan and is today utilized to safe a killer of two!!! do we call it hypocrisy or change in policy , i think both would mean similar ...

and guess what, i find this shameful too !!!

 

SHAAMYL77

1:40 PM ET

March 19, 2011

Latino54

Well said, these are in fact indians posing themselves as Americans by using Western names....

Well, they are so blind in Pak-bashing that they forget even basics of etiquettes and spew poison against Pakistan even portraying positive events as negative.

Well, Goebbels must be feeling ashamed in his grave that why he not used indian hindus to propagate against Jews during WW-II.

 

TINNAS

11:03 PM ET

April 11, 2011

Re: How to convert AVI, MKV, VOB

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . ipad converter This special ipad video converter can convert all video formats to iPad compatible formats. video to ipad converter To show you pdf files converter on this pdf converter for mac

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

5:31 AM ET

March 17, 2011

Look a little further

Blood money is a relic of a system designed for an earlier time, essentially a means of arresting the constant back and forth of inter-tribal feuds, a substitute for vengeance. Nor are its origins uniquely Islamic, the German invaders of the Roman world practised it (the life of a Roman was calculated at about half that of a German).

It remains a sensible solution, obviously the US found it so in this case. It is only somewhat strange that those so ready to wallow in tepid sentimentality would prefer Davis to have been hanged.

 

ARYABHAT

7:27 AM ET

March 17, 2011

No more Humint - Thank you Mr Davis!

According to South Asia Analysis Group - "It is leant from reliable sources in Pakistan that acceptance of blood money by the heirs to the two Pakistanis who were killed by Raymond Davis on January 27, 2011, their withdrawal of the complaint of murder against him, his release from detention in the Kot Lakpat jail of Lahore and his airlift from Lahore to the Bagram air base of the US in Afghanistan and subsequently to the US naval base in Diego Garcia on March 16,2011,followed an agreement reached between the Inter-Serices Intelligence (ISI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in secret talks held in Oman under the intermediary of the Saudi intelligence under which the CIA has agreed not to run its own Human intelligence (HUMINT) network in Pakistani territory."

URL: http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers44/paper4383.html

If this is true, the case then I believe we all in western countries are on a wing and a prayer for our safety as it iwas CIA's own Humint that redically neutralised Talibans and their safe houses inside Pakistan!

 

ASAD KHAN

10:27 AM ET

March 17, 2011

Davis release.

Remond Davis release is the result of ISI_CIA agreement.The families of the victims would do anything before the powerful giants under patent or laten threat of extinction.One thing has emerged from this episode--how much the US cares for its citizens.ISI and GHQ are two sides of the same coin.it was Establishment behind the Davis release. the families of the two victims must have been ordered to remain silent.it is a closed chapter now.

 

WHATEVERSCHMUKS

11:10 AM ET

March 17, 2011

What I find amusing and

What I find amusing and ironic is that the same US who fights Shariah law with all its might in every country and criticizes all its rules fell victim to a settlement under that same law and now has to lie to its citizens now over fears of a backlash .

Obviously the law has safeguards against victims signing away their right to justice under duress, which so obviously happened here. The families have since disappeared off the face of the earth.

The US and the ISI has made a joke out of the law and the justice meted out in the name of Sharia.

Asking the victims families, no, i think Americans should be asking Hiliary who gave $2.4 million to free a terrorist from undergoing due judicial process in a country in which he killed 2 and caused the death of 2 more.

 

POSTULATE OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

8:27 PM ET

March 17, 2011

WHATEVERSHMUKS AND ASAD KHAN

WHATEVER.... basically i agree with your opinions and deducements in a nutshell.
ASAD KHAN and the likes thereof - please read more, watch more, analyse more. and most of all after doing all this please do not render the brain to amnesia- do remember past so u can link it up to present and calculate future. Hopefully then we will be able to analyse more rationally - what's right is right and what's not is not - regardless of "our side or their side".

It is universally impossible for one side to always be the agressor and the other side to always be the victim - be it one country to another country or one govement to its people or even as close up as one spouse to another.

In this case - tough between "David and Goliath" -