Wednesday, March 9, 2011 - 9:43 AM

Event notice: Join the New America Foundation and Foreign Policy magazine this Friday at 12:15pm EST in Washington, DC for a discussion of Peter Bergen's new book, The Longest War, which the New York Times called "essential" and "highly informed" (NAF).
Funeral dirge
As
many as 37 people were killed and more than 100 wounded earlier today
when a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan suicide bomber, believed to be a boy in
his teens, targeted the funeral of the wife of a local anti-Taliban
lashkar leader in the suburbs of the northwestern city of Peshawar (AP, NYT, AFP, ET/Reuters, Geo, Dawn, Post).
A witness said, "The suicide bomber very easily came here and joined
the participants. There was not a single policeman to check him." In the
Dera Bugti area of Pakistan's southwest Baluchistan province, five
civilians were killed in a landmine explosion near a small pickup truck (AP).
For the first time, the Pakistani military has provided official, on-the-record details about the U.S. drones program in the country's northwest, describing militant fatalities from the strikes in North Waziristan from 2007 to 2011 (Dawn).
Maj-Gen Ghayur Mehmood, who is in charge of troops in the tribal
agency, stated, "There are a few civilian casualties in such precision
strikes, but a majority of those eliminated are terrorists, including
foreign terrorist elements." For more about the drone strikes, visit "The Year of the Drone," and for more about how drone strikes are viewed in Pakistan's tribal areas, visit PakistanSurvey.org.
Aaron
Mark DeHaven, the American contractor who overstayed his visa and was
detained, has been released from a Peshawar jail after paying the
$23,500 bail (AFP).
Chris Allbritton explores how Pakistan's various Islamist parties are
coalescing around a shared hatred of the United States (Reuters).
Caught in the middle
The United Nations has released its annual report
on civilian casualties in Afghanistan, finding that in 2010, which saw a
15 percent increase from 2009 in the total number of civilians killed
in conflict, insurgents were responsible for 75 percent of the 2,777
total conflict-related civilian deaths in the country (AP, NYT, Reuters).
The report also notes that targeted killings of Afghan government
officials, aid workers, and civilians perceived to be supportive of NATO
forces or the Afghan government more than doubled from the previous
year, and observed a 26 percent decline in the number of civilian deaths
caused by Afghan and coalition forces. The Journal reports that even as
coalition forces have reduced this number, 44 Afghan civilians were
killed by coalition helicopters in 2010, up from 10 in 2009 (WSJ). Bonus read: the war over Afghan civilian casualties (FP).
The
Post reports that many American experts deployed to Afghanistan as part
of the Obama administration's 'civilian surge' "remain hunkered down in
the capital, Kabul, removed from the front lines where they are most
needed," and that programs designed to improve the Afghan government's
capacity in 80 "key terrain" districts have fallen "far behind schedule"
(Post).
Two-thirds of the 1,100 American civilian officials in Afghanistan are
posted in Kabul, according to the State Department. McClatchy adds that
there is "no clear plan" to reduce the number of foreign civilian
advisers in Afghan government ministries (McClatchy).
Afghan
president Hamid Karzai said yesterday that he will arrange an Afghan
jirga to discuss the terms under which U.S. forces might stay in
Afghanistan after 2014 (Guardian).
Karzai also rejected calls from members of parliament to disband the
special tribunal he ordered set up to investigate claims of fraud in
last year's parliamentary elections, referring the MPs to Afghanistan's
supreme court (Pajhwok).
Mixed messages
Top
U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan Gen. David Petraeus gave an
interview to the NYT describing "an improving overall picture" of
security in Afghanistan, "offering a preview of what is likely to be his
argument next week when he testifies before Congress for the first
time since he took over command of coalition forces in Afghanistan" (NYT).
Although operational tempo has increased "enormously," militant
reintegration and local police training efforts have "only modest
momentum." U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates met with leaders of an
Afghan Local Police force in the Arghandab river valley in Kandahar,
where he was "encouraged," though he noted that gains are "fragile and
reversible" (WSJ, AP).
In the Sangin district of Helmand province, where 29 Marines have died
in the last five months alone and which he also visited yesterday, Gates
commented on the recent "dramatic turnaround" in security conditions (NYT).
From
Ghazni province, C. J. Chivers has today's must-read analyzing how the
U.S. military has "slowly, almost imperceptibly" shifted from fighting
the Taliban for influence in "well-known and conventionally defined
areas" to waging "a campaign for scattered villages and bits of terrain"
(NYT).
A colonel describes the "great disconnect" between the "intense efforts
of American small units at the tactical level and larger strategic
trends."
And the State Department has renewed its travel warning
for Afghanistan, cautioning that the security situation remains
"critical" (AFP).
Reclaiming territory
The
AP visited Pakistan's scenic Swat Valley ski slopes, once controlled by
Taliban fighters and used as a training and logistics base, for a few
downhill runs (AP). Pakistan's only ski resort, Malam Jabba will cost some $4 million to reconstruct properly, according to tourism officials.
Sign up here to receive the daily brief in your inbox. Follow the AfPak Channel on Twitter and Facebook.
Here's what Pakistan's certified ass interior minister said recently:
http://tribune.com.pk/story/129965/malik-gives-terrorists-last-chance-to-surrender/
We all know and understand that politicians in Pakistan have little or no say when it comes to big-time decision making. This may sound hurtful to many but we are also cognizant of the fact that we can safely conclude that the Pakistani military intelligence agencies not only shelters terrorists and religious fundamentalists but is also involved in instigating violence and suicide attacks whenever things are not moving according to their plans.
After 10 billion dollars of US aid aimed at curbing militancy, Pakistan has failed to:
a) Minimize terrorism;
b) Used US money to encourage terrorism.
Although one does not have concrete evidence to support the claim that the Pakistani armed forces do indeed support militancy, their track record is clear enough to show that it is in their 'nature' to 'stay busy' with nefarious activities. For instance, the ISI ( Inter-Services Intelligence ) for years created havoc in Indian Kashmir, supporting the jihadis to gain independence from India.
ISI has also been a massive role-player in Afghanistan. In the post-Soviet invasion time, ISI practically took over Afghanistan and basically tore apart any prospects of the establishment of a broad based government in Kabul.
Last year, Secretary of State, Ms. Hillary Clinton, questioned and wondered, while in Pakistan, as to why Pakistan will not know about Bin Laden's whereabouts. This was a sharp pointer to the fact that the US does indeed know that Pakistan harbors terrorists.
All said and done, these killings are not stopping anytime soon. It is in the interest of the US to put restrictions on the rampant aid that is sent to Pakistan. The least that can be done is to create a dynamics whereby the Pakistanis are answerable to the channeling of the aid.
Secondly, how about telling the Pakistanis to get rid of the blasphemy law before any further US tax payer money is sent out?
Pakistan is suffering from self-inflicted wounds
Sooner or later the world including US and Europe have to realize that Pakistan projects sympathetic image as a victim of terror, even as it is, in fact, the creator of terrorism. Pakistan continues to shelter, nurture, support and protect innumerable terrorist outfits on its soil.
Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Benazir Bhutto’s democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.
Nobody forced Pakistani Army and Intelligence to create what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called ‘this jihadist Frankenstein’ monster in 1990s. Pakistani Army and Intelligence chose to do so with the full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments at the time.
Pakistan boldly holds the Western world to ransom. It garners generous financial aid and military supplies from the US and has successfully projected itself as recourse of last resort in its geographical theatre. It runs circles around international sanctions and bans by nurturing a large number of home-grown terrorist outfits forever changing nomenclature. In addition, it maintains seemingly endless supply of freelance non-state actors that allow it the fig-leaf of plausible deniability.
And in a masterful demonstration of how to manage chaos, Pakistan keeps its domestic situation in destabilized ferment and flux by stoking sectarian, that is, Sunni versus Shiite violence, and religious tensions between Islamic progressives and fundamentalists.
For the further bamboozling of the West, Pakistan uses its blow-hot-blow-cold relationship with the Pakistani and Afghan Taliban and its hosting of the Al Qaeda as adroit bargaining chips.
Pakistan also blackmails US by hinting menacingly about the possibility of its nuclear weapons falling to the Islamic fundamentalists led by Taliban as well even though it is Pakistani Army that created Taliban to begin with as Sandy Berger, Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in 2004, 'Pakistani Army was the midwife of Taliban'. UN report on Bhutto killing released on 4/15/10 confirmed this fact when it noted that "The PAKISTANI MILITARY ORGANIZED AND SUPPORTED THE TALIBAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF AFGHANISTAN IN 1996“.
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE