The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

Equality in the eyes of the law in Pakistan

By Huma Imtiaz, January 31, 2011 Share

It seemed to be simple case of shooting in self-defense in a busy street in Lahore, after being threatened at gunpoint by robbers. The twists in the narrative, however, have made it into a front-page story here in Pakistan. The person who killed the two men, Faizan and Faheem, was Raymond Davis, a U.S. citizen and reportedly a member of the U.S. Embassy staff. And when Davis called the U.S consulate in Lahore for help, a staff member allegedly killed another person, Ubaid ur Rehman, in a hit-and-run accident after speeding down on the wrong side of the road in an attempt to reach Davis.

Davis has been arrested, and is in police custody in Lahore. Pakistani authorities, eager to stake their claims about the sovereignty of the Pakistani nation and the rule of law, have vowed to not hand over Davis until an investigation into the matter is completed. Members of political and religious parties have urged the government not to release Davis, while anonymous text messages have circulated asking the government to swap Davis for Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, the Pakistani neuroscientist who was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in an American court last fall for attempting to murder her U.S. interrogators in Afghanistan.

The Davis incident brings up many questions. Firstly, who IS Raymond Davis? Reports are still mixed. According to ABC News, Davis is a private security officer. The U.S. Embassy in Islamabad calls Davis a "diplomat". The truth is anyone's guess.

The U.S Embassy says Davis was "assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, has a U.S. diplomatic passport and Pakistani visa valid until June 2012." They have called for his release, saying that as a diplomat, Davis has immunity under the Vienna Convention. But on Sunday night, Dawn News, a local Urdu channel, broadcast what it says are images of Davis' passport -- which did not have a diplomatic visa.

The Davis incident has already added fuel to the fire that is known as U.S.-Pakistan relations. In a country where the U.S. enjoys very little popularity, an incident of a "diplomat" shooting two Pakistanis, whether they were robbers or not, has helped fuel anti-U.S. sentiment. At a protest, organized in Karachi by Jamaat-e-Islami, a religious party, hundreds of protestors condemned the incident.

Local newspapers with right-wing, anti-American leanings, such as The Nation, ran headlines such as "'American Rambo' goes berserk in City", whereas Urdu newspaper columnists have urged that the law be allowed to take its course.

Others have asked questions about what Davis was doing in Pakistan, and why he tried fleeing the scene after the incident. Columnist Ejaz Haider asked, "Why did Davis try to run away from the scene after displaying the calm ability to shoot a pistol with a steady hand, get out of the car, make a video of the bodies, and talk to someone on the wireless?" The News' Ansar Abbasi, a right-wing columnist with a strong anti-American streak, cited previous incidents of embassy officials in Pakistan involved in carrying weapons. The News also ran a story titled "How U.S. behaves when diplomats commit crimes."

As the tug-of-war continues between the U.S. and Pakistani governments over Davis' immunity and whether he should be tried for murder or not, there is an urgent need for diplomacy and tact in this case. If Davis is not actually a diplomat, the U.S. Embassy should allow Pakistani law to take its course if it would like to improve its reputation in the country.

However, the issue, which has already been politicized, will take a nasty turn for the worse if Davis is indeed a diplomat, and enjoys diplomatic immunity in the case. Religious and political parties, aided by columnists and sections of the media with anti-U.S. slant, will blame the Pakistani government for ceding to the U.S. government's demands, regardless of the facts of the case.

Secondly, it is ironic that religious and political parties are demanding justice in this case, and yet turn a blind eye to the injustices within Pakistan, and those blatantly and proudly flouting the rule of law. Mumtaz Qadri -- who killed the governor of Punjab, Salmaan Taseer, in cold blood because of his support for changing Pakistan's controversial blasphemy laws -- has been lauded as a hero and defender of Islam, while Davis, who may have been acting in mere self-defense from potential robbers, is called a demon. If everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, political leaders in Pakistan need to remember to demand justice for anyone who takes the law into their own hands.

Huma Imtiaz works as a journalist in Pakistan and can be reached at huma.imtiaz@gmail.com.

RIZWAN TABASSUM/AFP/Getty Images

 

PHILIP THE AQUARIAN

3:33 PM ET

January 31, 2011

Raymond Davis

Yes I agree with trading Raymond Davis for Aafia Siddiqui, if they throw in Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Saif al-Adel, Adam Gadahn, and Adnan Shukrijumah who are all in Lower Dir District, KP, Pakistan. We know. So does Pakistan. We know the village. Time's up, Pakistan.

 

YUMMYDUMMY

6:19 PM ET

February 1, 2011

@PHILIPTHE AQUARIAN

Dude, how can you be so sure about all these crackhead dramas hiding in Dir Lower?

 

MARTY MARTEL

9:52 PM ET

January 31, 2011

There is NO equality in the eyes of Pakistani laws

Everybody in Pakistan knows that laws are ignored and judges are bought, pressured or ordered by the governing authorities as they please.

Afterall democratic government of Pakistan of its own free will, facilitated relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996.

Even democratically elected Nawaz Sharif had talked about replacing supreme court judges during 1990s because those judges will give verdicts that he did not like.

There is NO equality in the eyes of the law in Pakistan because it condemned a Christian women to die for a minor offense.

So the talk of ‘equality in the eyes of law’ is a misnomer in a fundamentalist Islamic State of Pakistan.

 

JUSTROUNDTHECORNER

1:22 AM ET

February 1, 2011

"Everybody in Pakistan knows

"Everybody in Pakistan knows that laws are ignored and judges are bought, pressured or ordered by the governing authorities as they please."

Pure speculation, i would really be interested in multiple concrete proofs for this assertion, without which this is nothing much but an assertion.

"Afterall democratic government of Pakistan of its own free will, facilitated relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996."

Proof? possibly from someone who does not have his own interests associated with the event. Secondly even if this assertion were true, how does this event have anything to do with the enforcement of the law within Pakistan?

"Even democratically elected Nawaz Sharif had talked about replacing supreme court judges during 1990s because those judges will give verdicts that he did not like."

Does talking about something equate to doing? By the same logic every American president who even hinted at bombing the soviet union with nuclear weapons should be tried for manslaughter since they "talked about" bombing and killing millions with bombs.

"There is NO equality in the eyes of the law in Pakistan because it condemned a Christian women to die for a minor offense."

Does one event prove the rule? The process of law implementation might be flawed but then Pakistan is not the only ones with at times flawed process of law implementation. Even the American Government is guilty of the same, Guantanamo Bay? Abu Gharib? Treatment of American Japanese citizens during world war 2? Retaliation against muslims in American after 9/11? Do these events ring a bell?

 

YUMMYDUMMY

6:21 PM ET

February 1, 2011

Right On!

No doubt about that.

 

CEOUNICOM

5:34 PM ET

February 2, 2011

re: "retaliation"

""Retaliation against muslims in American after 9/11?"

You're equating the internment of the Japanese with... what again? a few isolated incidents of people beating up convenience store owners? Sikhs getting confused for arabs? WTF are you even talking about? Hyperbole much?

 

JUSTROUNDTHECORNER

4:46 AM ET

February 4, 2011

@CEOUNICOM

Dude you just proved my point, a few isolated incidents do not prove the rule.

 

SAIF UR REHMAN

5:10 PM ET

February 3, 2011

yes, huma davis, i agree with u

you deserve an applause for making your argument. certainly, davis killed boys in self defence. Its a simple case, I do not know why people misunderstand. rather we need more AMERICAN RAMBOS in pakistan to exterminate the unwanted guys.......
you also deserve an appreciation for being a true loyalists of your masters. good, keep it up.

 

UA777CAPTAIN

5:09 AM ET

February 5, 2011

Pakistan owes you Nothing! NOTHING!

I love the manner in which americans continually make demands of other countries, feel they can murder others without repercussion and then complain when other nations apply their laws correctly. i mean, one american psycopath decides to shoot two innocent boys in the back and then radios for help, whereupon a car full of more american degenerates decide they can ram multiple cars and murder another man. Really???

Well, girls, prepare your inferior minds for a shock - Pakistan owes you nothing, will give you nothing, and will be the entity that eventually brings you to your knees one way or another. Perhaps demonstrating a little respect for the rights and sovereignty of other nations might result in a slightly better outcome for american murderers. Frankly, this story brings into doubt the preposterous claims by the american embassy in Cairo that someone stole an embassy car after video was released showing an american diplomatic vehicle deliberately running over innocent Egyptians protesting against america's main puppet investment in the region. Since governments like Egypt and Pakistan seem unable to hold american murderers accountable, perhaps its time for ordinary people to play the great american game of "eye for an eye"