The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

Daily brief: U.S. consular employee in Pakistan shootout

By Katherine Tiedemann, January 27, 2011 Share

Shootout in Lahore

A U.S. consular employee Geo TV names as "Davis" reportedly shot and killed two men on motorcycles who apparently tried to rob him in Lahore earlier today, and another may also have died in connection with the incident (Geo, AP, AFP/ET, Reuters, BBC). A crowd reportedly gathered at the scene and set tires on fire in protest (AFP).

Ustadh Ahmad Farooq, al-Qaeda's purported media chief in Pakistan, said in a recent audio recording in a rare admission of pressure, "There were many areas where we once had freedom, but now they have been lost... We are the ones that are losing people, we are the ones facing shortages of resources. Our land is shrinking and drones are flying in the sky" (AP). There were 118 reported U.S. drone strikes in northwest Pakistan last year, and 9 so far in 2011, most in North Waziristan (NAF).

Sebastian Rotella has a massive profile of Sajid Mir, one of the lead plotters of the deadly 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks with ties to Pakistani security forces whose "global trail traces Lashkar[e-Taiba]'s evolution" (ProPublica). Rotella writes that Mir and those killed represent a "wrenching national-security dilemma" for the Obama administration: "whether the larger interests of the United States in maintaining good relations with Pakistan will permit Mir and other suspects to get away."

Human rights in Afghanistan

Afghan president Hamid Karzai's apparent early pick for speaker of Afghanistan's newly inaugurated parliament, Abdul Rab Rasoul Sayyaf, has been accused of ties in the 1980 and 90s with Osama bin Laden and with ordering a 1993 massacre of hundreds of Hazara civilians in Kabul, among other "horrific episodes" during Afghanistan's civil war (McClatchy). Alissa Rubin writes that Karzai, "outnumbered and outmaneuvered" by Afghan MPs who pushed for parliament to be inaugurated yesterday, "has become increasingly isolated over the past 16 months since the 2009 presidential election" and "increasingly turns to a small group of advisers and on several occasions has begun to miscalculate" (NYT).

Nick Schifrin has today's must-read describing a graphic video of an October 2010 Taliban-ordered stoning of a couple who ran away together in northern and eastern Afghanistan, the first documented stoning in the country since the Taliban were in power (ABC). The stoning took place in Kunduz in front of a crowd of around 200 people, and the video was captured on a cell phone. Afghan authorities say the men who carried out the stoning, which was defended by a Taliban spokesman, will be brought to justice (BBC).

Some Afghan officials reportedly want to "adopt the U.S. practice of detaining suspected insurgents indefinitely without trial," and though Karzai has complained about the U.S. policy before, some of his senior officials support the move as a step toward taking charge of detentions from the U.S. and NATO (Post). American officials and some international Christian organizations are pressing for the release of two men who were arrested on charges of apostasy after converting to Christianity, which carries a death sentence for those convicted (WSJ). The chief of staff for Afghanistan's ministry of justice asserted, "The sentence for a convert is death and there is no exception. They must be sentenced to death to serve as a lesson for others."

Hello hello baby, you called?

Britain's ministry of defense is on the hunt for a soldier in Afghanistan who left a message for his pregnant girlfriend, Samantha, on the answering machine of a 44 year old mother of three from Gateshead (Times, CNN, BBC, Sky). The soldier said, "I love you so much, I love you with all my heart and I was going to ask you, don't answer, obviously you can't answer, but will you marry me?"

Sign up here to receive the daily brief in your inbox. Follow the AfPak Channel on Twitter and Facebook.

DMITRY KOSTYUKOV/AFP/Getty Images

 

_YOURSTRULY_

12:27 PM ET

January 27, 2011

Pakistanis want to be the only terror loving society ...

Pakistanis want to live in a terrorist supporting society. This is what they will get. If he hadn't killed them the headline would have been 'American diplomat killed in Lahore'.
Two men on a motor cycle is now Pakistan's terror hallmark. And before Pakistanisgo to burning the American flag, yet again, they should realize that while the Chinese have been just talking for 60+ years, it is the Americans who are keeping Pakistan afloat with their generous 'bakhshish' of billions of dollars each year. Pakistanis complain of high food and other costs. They haven't a clue of the worst, which is coming. Each meal they eat is because of the American tax payer's dollars coming to them. Without that Pakistan would just be another Ethiopia or Sudan or Somalia.
So Pakistanis should learn to be thankful to Allah at each meal, that He has given the Americans the money and resources to keep feeding them...

 

GRANT

2:15 PM ET

January 27, 2011

Although the Pakistani public

Although the Pakistani public is probably a bit hypocritical about this we should remember that we don't know the details of the matter.

 

BILLYTHEKID

5:25 PM ET

January 27, 2011

yourstruly

first i would like to say is that you need to be more informed before making an opinion.pakistan has lost everything in the so called war on terror.its economy,social values and fabric along with its institutions.
as far as the money is concerned the top brass get it for their loyalty not pakistani nation.
and had we in pakistan as pakistanis had the integrity and love for our country.this war would have cost the US 10 times the amount currently its paying for it.
US pays only $ 1.5 b a year and the amount if we had levied on the toll for the use of pakistans air space,roads and land,i believe the figure would have been 15 billion plus every year.

lastly kindly read the book THE ECONOMIC HITMAN by John Perkins if you have the time and the audacity to face the real truth as put by a white american whose conscience woke up after he had screwed a number of nations...now wouldn,t that be the american way of life.

 

SAIF UR REHMAN

6:30 PM ET

January 27, 2011

what a nonsense comment....yourstruly

r u drunk? u r putting such a pathetic argument that US is paying billion of dollars! do you actually know how much US is paying and how much pakistan has suffered in this american war?

US is paying to the corrupt rulers of pakistan to deposit back the money into their private foreign bank accounts. but for howlong?One can not immagine the level of hatred which every pakistani is developing for US .

 

_YOURSTRULY_

9:55 PM ET

January 27, 2011

I stand by my observations and my comments....

If any of you, of if the Pakistani society at large, was any capable you would not be sitting in the dark without electricity and without gas.
So, once again you can only be thankful to the Americans for their BILLIONS to even have
food on your table. If you didn't have that your beloved capitalist leaders like Nawaz Sharif and his cohoots, who are robbing the country blind, would even deprive you of basic food.
A society which after 60+ years of wretched existence, cannot even produce enough food, or power, or have any kind of infra strucutre, and is lawless, governed by two men on a motorcycle phenomenon, has something fundamentally wrong about them.
And the bottom line is your love for violence and terror. Your claim to be Allah's thugs to persecute whoever disagrees with you. For 60+ years you have wanted to live in such a fascist lawless society. Now you have earned it.
No electrcity, no gas, little food, but the ego of biggest hoodlums of the world...
It is quite understandable.
But living in such wretched conditions in a failed state must be hard....

 

CEOUNICOM

12:17 PM ET

January 31, 2011

.... sad

...that most people can't read the news here without it using to simply repeat a PAKISTAN vs U.S. IS TO BLAME FOR EVERYTHING story, many of which include blatant factual distortions...

Not surprisingly, even the newspapers seem to spin things similarly = the Geo story didn't even bother to mention that the consulate worker was accosted by armed men, preferring to focus on those injured and the protests... whereas every other press piece at least refers to the 'alleged self defence'... Its not even relevant in the Pakistani media, apparently. They also (mistakenly) suggest the shooter also committed a hit & run, whereas it was a separate vehicle altogether.

The Herald tribune mentions it frequently = ""Earlier reports suggested that the police declared those who were killed as armed dacoits. "" No mention of such a police declaration in the Pakistani media.