Wednesday, January 5, 2011 - 4:53 PM

The
brutal assassination of Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer by a man in his security
detail is being tied to a courageous stand he took opposing the nation's
antiquated blasphemy laws and supporting a Catholic woman, Aasia Bibi, accused
of blasphemy.
But there is another important position Taseer has taken that should be
emphasized: he was one of very few Pakistani politicians who honestly and
openly recognized the existence of the "Tehrik-i-Taliban Punjab," sometimes
called the "Punjabi
Taliban," comprised, through the years, of an alphabet soup of sectarian
militant organizations: Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) Harkat-ul Mujahideen (HUM),
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) and Sipah-e-Sahaba (SSP), among
others, inspired by an intolerant brand of Sunni Islam called Deobandism.
This past June, Dawn, a leading English language daily in Pakistan, carried
this headline: "Punjabi
Taliban are a reality: Taseer." The governor of the province of Punjab was
taking a brave stand because the militants of these groups were born in his
state in towns with names such as Bahawalpur and Raheem Yar Khan. But, with
attacks on mosques, bazaars and police stations in Punjab, they were also
killing his innocent citizens. Aasia Bibi, the Catholic woman sitting in jail
for blasphemy, was one of the citizens of Punjab, and the call to kill her
comes out of supporters of the Punjabi Taliban.
The best way for Pakistan to honor Taseer is to admit its homegrown militancy
and destroy it. America and the West must also recognize that the problem of
militancy in South Asia isn't restricted to Afghanistan or the Federally
Administered Tribal Areas in Pakistan. It's also in the very heartland of Pakistan.
Later
this month, on the ninth anniversary of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel
Pearl's kidnapping in Karachi on January 23, 2002, my co-professor at
Georgetown University, Barbara Feinman Todd, and I will publish a report at the
Center for Public Integrity,
describing the findings of the Pearl
Project, a faculty-student investigative reporting project into Danny's
murder, and we will chronicle how Danny's case was an early harbinger of the
problems Pakistan -- and the world -- face today from militants in the Punjab.
For America, the threat from the Punjabi militants is not just something far away.
The militant groups that make up the Punjabi Taliban have been tied to the 2008
Mumbai attacks. David Headley, the Pakistani-American who changed his name from
Daood Sayed Gilani, was a point man for the Mumbai attacks and trained by Lashkar-e-Taiba,
one of the Punjab-based militant groups. Also, Pakistan security experts say
the Punjabi Taliban work closely with the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, a group
linked to the attempted 2010 Time Square bomb attack by U.S. citizen Faisal
Shahzad, as well as with al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The sad tale of the Punjabi Taliban and its destructive force is yet another story of Frankenstein's monster returning to kill its creator. In the 19th century novel, Henry Frankenstein, the scientist who created the monster, is only saved when villagers destroy the monster. Similarly, the Punjabi militant groups are the creation of Pakistan, and the nation's salvation rests only in the people of Pakistan destroying them.
Sadly,
instead of a nation denouncing the alleged killer, Malik Hussein Mumtaz Qadri,
lawyers in Pakistan showered
rose petals upon him when he appeared in court, supporters kissed him on the
cheek, and he wore a garland of roses and jasmine usually worn by bridegrooms
to celebrate weddings.
After the Mumbai attacks
Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a South
Asia expert formerly on the U.S. State Department's Policy Planning Staff, said
that "Pakistan's government may be unable to control the ‘Frankenstein's
monster' it created when it helped train terrorists to infiltrate and fight
against Indian rule in the disputed Kashmir region." Taseer's assassination
indicates that is true now more than ever before.
It's a long history that brings Pakistan to this moment. In 1947, Pakistan was
born out of the independence of India from the British. For 30 years it
experienced a mostly moderate expression of Islam. In 1977, however, General
Zia ul-Haq took over Pakistan and brought an Islamist revolution to the
country, including support for the nation's blasphemy laws. To counter the 1979
Shia revolution in Iran, the hard-line Sunni government of Saudi Arabia pumped
millions of dollars into Pakistan, turning it into a proxy state for its rigid,
fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. The Islamic fervor fueled the
mujahideen who battled against the Soviet Union with U.S. covert aid when the
Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979. With the 1989 withdrawal of the Soviets
from Afghanistan, the Pakistani military and its intelligence unit, the
Inter-Services Intelligence directorate or ISI, redirected the Islamist fervor
for jihad in the 1990s into the creation of militant organizations with their
eyes set on liberating Kashmir from Pakistan's enemy, India.
The home base for these groups: the province of Punjab, the military, religious
and cultural heartland of the country.
Taseer's alleged assassin, Qadri, was born in 1984 or 1985 outside Islamabad in
the Punjab province, according to Pakistani media. Qadri grew up during the
rising tide of militancy, becoming a member of Punjab's elite force commandos. He
had some telltale physical signs of a rigid practitioner of Islam. At such a
young age, he had a darkened spot on his forehead, usually a sign of piety from
a lifetime of praying and touching your forehead to the ground. (It took my
father, 75, a lifetime of praying to get that spot.) Hardcore youth sometimes
rub rocks on their foreheads to get that mark at a young age. Qadri also had a
beard of the length worn by practitioners of hardline interpretations of Islam
-- not that all are violent, of course, but it can be an indicator. In
handcuffs, he smiled happily at his achievement.
A Facebook
page went up hours after the assassination with messages of support for
Qadri. One message: "nation hero u win a hearts of All muslim
umaah........Saluteeeee You........!!!!" ("Umaah" is a reference to "ummah," or
"community.") It's not clear if the assassin was directly linked to any
militant groups, but his sympathies most certainly would have been with them.
It's an even
more alarming testimony about the spread of militancy in Pakistan that Qadri is
believed to be Barelvi and it is Barelvi religious leaders who are telling
Pakistanis not to pray for Taseer. The Barelvis have traditionally had a more
Sufi, moderate interpretation of Islam than the Deobandis. When Danny was
kidnapped in 2002, a Pakistani police officer didn't believe that the man Danny
was supposed to meet, Sheik Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani, could have entrapped him,
because he said, "He's Barelvi." The descent of Barelvi practitioners into
militancy is frightening.
In the decades since militancy took root in the nation, Pakistan has mostly refused
to admit the extent of the dangers of the Punjabi militants, as Taseer bravely
did. This summer, Taseer accused
leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League-N political party, run by former
Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, of having ties with the
"Tehrik-i-Taliban Punjab." Sharif, a native of Punjab, considers the province
his base.
Around that time, Interior Minister Rehman Malik denied he had accused the
Punjabi Taliban of involvement in the attacks that month on two mosques in
Lahore where members of the minority Ahmadi sect prayed. He denied he alleged
that the provincial Punjab government was linked to the Punjabi Taliban. "I
have never used a terminology which reflects provincialism, but people know
with which names terrorists are being recognized. One can see these names on
the internet and in national dailies," Pakistani media quoted
Malik as saying.
In
fact, Pakistani media quoted
him talking about the "Punjabi Taliban," and earlier, Rehman had said
the Punjabi Taliban support the TTP. Malik specifically identified
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, one of the militant organizations that falls under the umbrella
of the Pakistani Taliban. It took
responsibility for the attacks, as well as earlier attacks on the Sri Lankan
cricket team in Lahore in 2009 and the Punjab police headquarters in the
city of Manawa, as well as other attacks. As our Pearl Project report will
show, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi was intricately involved in Danny's kidnapping.
To be sure, Pakistan faces domestic political backlash if it attacks the
militant organizations too aggressively because they have some support among
the population. In a Pew
survey, released just as Taseer and his fellow politicians debated whether
the Punjabi Taliban even exist, Pakistani citizens said they increasingly view
terrorism as a significant problem. But they said they have become "less
concerned" that extremists might take control of the country. Just 51 percent
said they are concerned about an extremist takeover. Who were they most
threatened by? India. Shockingly considering that the survey was taken in urban
centers, 76 percent of those surveyed said that there should be a death penalty
for people who leave Islam, and 82 percent believed in "stoning adulterers."
The fact that Taseer's killer came from his security detail is troubling, but
not surprising, because of a wider phenomenon: much of Pakistan's military and
intelligence rank-and-file and officers come from the province of Punjab, and there
has been growing
concern among analysts
about the influence of militancy on recruits and about the growing reach
of the Punjabi militants.
As a politician, Taseer was courageous in speaking the truth about the enemy that is the Punjabi Taliban. It's long overdue for more of Pakistan's politicians to wake up to the country's homegrown terrorist problem. If they don't, Frankenstein's monster will destroy its creator -- the nation of Pakistan.
Asra Q. Nomani, a former reporter at the Wall Street Journal, is the author of Standing Alone: An American Woman's Struggle for the Soul of Islam. She teaches journalism at Georgetown University.
AFP/AFP/Getty Images
EXPLORE:AFPAK, AFPAK CHANNEL, AL QAEDA, INTELLIGENCE, MILITARY, PAKISTAN, TALIBAN, TERRORISM, U.S. FOREIGN POLICY
Taliban is creation of CIA (funded, trained and waponized)
I think the facts are being mutulated in your article when u mention that ISI was responsible for creation of Taliban. Pakistan is a 3rd world poor country they can neither support such an army nor train, what to talk about provide weapons.
This so called extremist army was in the interest of western countries especially USA, which funded, trained and weaponized the Jihad (holy war as you might put it) in Afghanistan ( basically to two factors... 1. To Keep USSR out of south east asia and middle east - Oil and Trade Routes... 2. To take revenge of its defeat in Vietnam).
The Government of Pakistan being always a puppet of USA (at that time General Zia ul Haq - As proven by Wikileaks recently also) bowed their head to the plan. The USA and Western Countries pumped in huge funds to raise the so called Islamic Madrasas and parties (which were actually being used for inciting the youngsters into Jihad and training them in weappons - its a well known fact).
The Islamic fenatical seeds (which wee just seeds at that time) were watered by USA and Western World to meet their own objectives. They were called Mujahideen by Western media at that time.... the same may be by yourself also if u were writing on pakistan and afghanistan at that time.
However, as usual like Vietnam and Iraq, the strategists of USA never worked on a re-habilitation plan (Pakistani Governments never think more thn 5 years which was to be executed at the end of this war (which lasted 11 years), thus after the end of this war the brain washed Mujahideen had to carry on their this taught islamic duty of conquering the world and making the whole world muslim by hook or by crook.
The above disastrous plans has led to the present situation where no innocent pakistani is safe..... there is no tolerance level in hard core elements which have grown from thousands to millions over years. What is the mistake of average literate Pakistani ..... nothing because their leadership was an idiot - which was chosen financed and brought into power by manipulation of USA and West..... So why do u blame pakistanis..... ask the leaders of USA and West.... Why do the want to control the world why cant they mind their own business?
Further, I would like to add here .... Salman Taseer murder was indeed not a good thing but he was an idiot of highest order who never knew when to speak, what to speak and where to speak..... being big mouthed does not mean that you are a bold man....it means you are the most stupid man in Pakistan - under present setup created by the above reasons.... if there is any injustice being done with Aasia Bibi..... we know it for a fact there isn't any fairness anywhere in the world ..... recent example is Iraq (over 1M people dead without a reason .... where are the WMDs for which all this drama of war was created .... why did 1 million innocent people died...... Afghanistan ..... over six hundred thousand innocent people killed.... where is Osama..... drone attacks in Pakistan ..... over one hundred thousand innocent people killed......). Where is the justice?...... where is the justice for Dr. Afia Siddiqui .... we all know about her.
The extremism is again being fuelled by USA and collation in Afghanistan and Pakistanby this so called war on terror.....Drone attacks are the prime reason for escalation in Pakistan.
In the end I would just like to say ..... PUT THE FACTS RIGHT DONT MAKE THEM UP...... REPORTERS AND WRITERS SHOULD MENTION THE FACTS AS THEY ARE .... NOT AS THEYWANT THEM TO BE......
I could go on and take your article step by step.... but if islamic law states that adulterers are to be stoned than they need to be stoned in a Islamic country .... thats our law and people who live in pakistan will abide by it .... we donot force our laws onto any other country.... why do they want to force their laws onto us.... when we will need their help we will ask for it .... but since 86%of the urban population agrees to stoning so this is what democracy is .... please accept it.
I am a pakistani not a devbandi nor a bharelvi nor a roman catholic or protestant .... I luv my country and its laws and its culture.... so let us live in peace within ourselves.... write something on historic blunders ..... like ..... war on iraq, war in aghanistan etc etc etc.
Thanks..
Dear AJKhan7, Thank you for writing. I can read in your posting a lot of pain and sorrow about the direction of Pakistan, whomsoever is to "blame." I feel your pain, as well. My dadi died in Pakistan, and so many of my family went there after partition to realize a dream. Sadly, now, it is a life filled with so many dangers.
There is a long history of blame that can go around. What I gently suggest is that really it is the responsibility of Pakistan to chart a course of moderation, rejecting the militants. The laws of adultery, I think you know, are ones of interpretation. The Quran doesn't even mention stoning, and even if it did we could use common sense to reject such medieval practices, as we do the slavery that is also mentioned in the Quran.
I think you know of the Quranic verse that says that we have to stand up for justice even if it's against our own kin. To me, that doesn't mean slaying a man for talking "too much." It means allowing freedom of voice and opposing those who use violence to silence others.
Thank you for writing, and I wish you well. Asra
everything is someone else's fault!
This response would have been funny if it weren't so sad, and alarming.
Sad because here is a country where someone has just been killed for speaking up on a medieval law, and the reaction at large is joyous. Its a bit tough, at the moment, to feel optimistic about Pakistan. Even this response blames Taseer for being a 'bigmouth', much as a rape victim could be blamed for 'asking for it'. Taseer is not being condemned for any of his other, real or imagined, misdeeds, but for speaking out against the blasphemy law. And the religious scholars are obviously siding with the killer.
Alarming for obvious reasons.
All CIA Funds Were Routed Through ISI
Actually, all CIA funding was routed through the ISI, and so it's the ISI which created the Afghan jihadi movement, always selecting the most rabid elements to arm and train. But the Taliban were not even in existence during the war against the Soviets, and only appeared in 1992 much after the Soviet withdrawal, having been created by ISI for the purpose of conquering Afghanistan and converting it into a satellite state for Pakistan.
Oh well, it looks like AlQaeda is getting the last laugh on the USA, because now they are lifting their sights and looking beyond Afghanistan, to even consider seizing control of Pakistan, the world's only nuclear-armed Islamic state.
It was not a Taliban sponsored muder
I could make out from the first few paragraphs that the article is written by some Indian, who doesn't have the slightest clue as to the complexity of situation in Pakistan. The murderer subscribes to Brelvi school of thought, whose clerics were at the forefront of recent anti-Taliban religious movement. In a country where common man feels oppressed by so many injustices and unjust applications of law, Blasphemy Law is not the most pressing issue for most people. While all thinking Pakistanis are deeply shocked and grieved over this murder, we must understand that the late Governor was flouting the countries laws by holding press conferences with a convicted Asia bibi, who should have been in Jail and that the case was still under appeal in Higher Courts. He did not take the right course for change in law, which was through Parliament, but brought the debate to media. Common man sees this flouting of law by Governor as a much bigger crime because for Muslims, the love of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.W.) take precedence over everything else.
As regards blaming Pakistan for all the terrorist acts in the world, this point of view is not supported even by many independent analysts in USA. I can't find any substance in these allegations on Pakistan made by prejudiced western media or their lickspittling Indian toadies.
...arbitrarily murdering people for saying unpopular things is perfectly OK.
Because the concept of 'free speech' has never entered into your thinking at all.
Well, you've convinced me! Case closed.
I never even implied what you pick from my comments. I only tried to highlight the reality of situation as it exists in Pakistan. I have no sympathy for anyone who takes law in his own hands - be it the Governor or his murderer. If Pakistan has to progress, everyone must abide by law and the ruling elite must take the lead role in doing so.
Strange that you condemn me without fully reading what I had written, but I understand how biases and prejudices can color our vision.
Asra Q Nomani is INDIAN american
Wikipedia says, "Asra Q Nomani (born 1965) is an Indian-American journalist, author, and feminist, known as an activist involved in the Muslim reform and Islamic feminist movements."
She makes the murder appear the work of Taliban, while it was done by anti-Taliban Brelvi.
I was not judgmental in presenting the reasons behind murder.
More Muslims have been arrested in Pakistan due to blasphemy law than non-Muslims. You can check that out.
Pakistan's basic problem is wide-spread flouting of laws by ruling elite, which undermine implementation of any law. In 19th Century USA, calling someone a liar could get you killed. When you live in a society like Pakistan, you cannot insult their most beloved Person, whether you like it or not. Same way as you cannot challenge holocaust in France or USA, despite their alleged freedom of speech.
If you criticize Israel, you can lose your job in USA, as happened to Helen Thomas - the most veteran reporter on the Washington Press Corps...
check this out at
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/979.html
For those who are not familiar with the dynamics of the region, the effort to delegitimize by pulling the India card is fairly typical. And I think unfortunate. It's a distraction, and I am sorry Esoul that you thought it an effective argument. Where were the Deobandi and Barelvi movements born but in India; in fact, in my homestate of Uttar Pradesh in northern India. I spent the night on the charpai of a courtyard in Barelvi, India, and it was a memorable evening under the stars, as are any evening in rural India or Pakistan.
It has been a generations long battle between these two schools of thought, and I am well aware of their differences.
It's for that reason, in particular, I say in the article, it is unfortunate that a practitioner of Barelvi Islam turns militant. It narrows the gap between the schools and that is a distressing sign for our times.
You say that the governor's crime was "flouting the law." Do you see that as justification to murder him?
I strongly condemn the murder and find no sympathy for anyone who uses religion or any other ideology to spread hatred or violence. In fact, my biggest desire is to witness lasting peace in South Asia, where I can comfortably travel to my ancestral towns in India. The future of the region does not lie in violence.
My main objection to the tone of your article is its focus on Taliban, when the murder was not their doing. Taliban are a fanatic and bigoted lot, who are not supported by majority of Pakistanis and they have no control over Pakistan's territories, except may be some areas of FATA. Even in FATA, they are hunted by our brave soldiers who are unjustifiably vilified by international media. If Taliban cross AfPak border, US and Afghan Forces are equally responsible for poor border control. How is it possible that Pak Army could be in league with Taliban when it has killed so many of them and has suffered so many deaths while combating Taliban? I personally know many members of Armed Forces who are all anti-Taliban. At the same time, ground realities dictate that lasting peace cannot be achieved without including Taliban in the equation and USA is also trying to negotiate with them. My question is: why is it acceptable for USA to communicate with Taliban and unacceptable for Pakistan?
As regards my comments on Governor, I was merely trying to explain the sentiment that led to his death and not support his murderer. Yet, everyone operating in Muslim world must be mindful of the extreme sensitivity of any comments about Prophet Muhammad S.A.W.W.
The fanatical society of Islamic Pakistan, the land of the pure
Western governments and foreign policy establishment as well as news media continue to propagate a myth that Pakistani society is ‘moderate Islamic’ while evidence keeps popping up to the contrary.
Lawyers (of all the people) showered rose petals on the assassin of Punjab governor when he arrived at a Pakistani court. As he left the court, a crowd of about 200 sympathizers chanted slogans in assassin’s favor. More than 500 clerics and scholars from the group Jamat Ahle Sunnat said no one should pray or express regret for the killing of the governor. The group representing Pakistan's majority Barelvi sect, which follows a brand of Islam considered moderate, also issued a veiled threat to other opponents of the blasphemy laws. "The supporter is as equally guilty as one who committed blasphemy," the group warned in a statement, adding politicians, the media and others should learn "a lesson from the exemplary death."
Pakistani Army and Intelligence chose to create what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called ‘this jihadist Frankenstein monster’ with the full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments in 1990s. The Army bosses in Rawalpindi, led by Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, are busy conspiring with the Taliban and Al Qaeda against the US in spite of being flush with US aid dollars and armed to the teeth with American weapons.
Punjab governor has been killed for supporting the scrapping of Pakistan’s odious blasphemy law, a legacy of Gen Zia-ul-Haq’s era of Islamization. Strange as it may seem, Gen Zia was a protege of the Americans who was liberally funded by the US to wage jihad against the USSR. The wages of that sin are now being reaped by Americans and Pakistanis while others are suffering on account of US folly and Pakistani fanaticism. The monster bred and raised by Pakistan has now begun to turn on its master. It’s an indisputable fact that more Pakistanis than anybody else have been killed by blood-thirsty Pakistanis driven by a macabre ideology steeped in hatred towards all, including their own co-religionists and fellow citizens. By no means does this mitigate the hideous crime of jihad but it does serve to highlight, though not for the first time, that Pakistan remains the epic center of violent Islamism that manifests itself in terrorism.
(11)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE