Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - 9:45 AM

Event notice/Wonk Watch: Join the New America Foundation tomorrow at
9:30am EST for the release of the Combating Terrorism Center at West
Point's new report, Self-Inflicted Wounds: Debates and Divisions within al-Qa'ida and its Periphery. Details and RSVP here.
No surprises here
The
Obama administration's one-year review of the Afghan war strategy,
which White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said will "not surprise" anyone
following the issue, is due out tomorrow, and Barack Obama met with his
national security team for two hours yesterday to give the final
approval (Post, FT, Tel).
The report is said to note that although progress has been made in some
areas of Afghanistan and the transition to Afghan security control "can
and should begin" in July 2011, the Karzai government receives low
marks for efficiency and corruption (Post).
Additionally,
many American civilian and military officials are reportedly
increasingly convinced that the U.S. needs to take "more forceful
action" in Baluchistan, directly across the border from Kandahar,
because of concerns about militant sanctuaries in Pakistan (Post).
The former senior diplomat in Kandahar, Bill Harris, commented, "We
knew the insurgents who attacked us were going to Pakistan to re-equip,
replenish, retrain and get orders to attack us again." Adm. Mike Mullen,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs, who headed to Pakistan on his 21st trip
there as chairman to meet with Pakistan's Army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez
Kayani, said yesterday that he carried a sense of "strategic impatience"
with the Pakistani government over its failure to prevent insurgents
from attacking coalition forces in Afghanistan (NYT, AP, ET).
The NYT and LAT add to reporting
about two grim new National Intelligence Estimates on Afghanistan and
Pakistan, representing the consensus views of the U.S.'s 16 intelligence
agencies, which military officials reportedly claim were "written by
desk-bound Washington analysts who have spent limited time, if any, in
Afghanistan and have no feel for the war" (NYT, LAT).
The NYT reports that the dispute reflects two things: debate in
Washington over whether the U.S. can succeed in Afghanistan without more
Pakistani cooperation, and "longstanding cultural differences between
intelligence analysts, whose job is to warn of potential bad news, and
military commanders, who are trained to promote "can do" optimism."
The Post clarifies its story mentioning Amb. Richard
Holbrooke's last words, which were originally reported to be, "You've
got to stop this war in Afghanistan," writing that a State Department
spokesman has cast the remarks as "humorous repartee" and an aide
emphasized that the comment was "made in painful banter, rather than as a
serious exhortation about policy" (Post).
Several outlets observe the difficulty of replacing the ambassador,
noting that the acting representative, Frank Ruggiero, is "unlikely to
be a permanent successor" and discussions about who will eventually fill
the post on a permanent basis have not yet begun (NYT, AP, Guardian, WSJ). Remembering Richard Holbrooke (FP).
A shaky government
The
Islamist political party JUI-F's withdrawal from Pakistan's ruling
coalition over Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani's dismissals of two
ministers yesterday will weaken the civilian government, but not deprive
it of a majority in Pakistan's parliament (AFP, Dawn, ET, ET, The News, The News). JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman is meeting with leaders from Jamaat-e-Islami and the PML-Q (The News).
And the MQM, the second largest partner in the current coalition, is
also reportedly holding crisis talks to "discuss the current political
situation and the ruling Pakistan People Party's (PPP) behavior towards
its allies," in the wake of a verbal outburst against the MQM by Sindh's
home minister, Zulfiqar Mirza (AFP/Dawn, ET, ET, Daily Times).
Police
in Karachi have reportedly arrested a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan
militant from Orakzai agency who allegedly planned to attack the Ashura
religious procession (AFP).
Three women were injured yesterday when a remote controlled bomb
detonated near a police vehicle on the outskirts of Peshawar, and
heavily armed militants reportedly attacked a security checkpoint on the
Afghan border in Mohmand agency, killing two soldiers (ET). And the first phase of repatriation for families displaced by fighting in South Waziristan has been completed (Daily Times). Bonus read: trickling home to South Waziristan (FP).
Flashpoint
Indian
police, concerned about potential separatist protests, have reportedly
fired tear gas and used batons to disperse hundreds of Muslims marching
to observe the Shia holy month of Muharram in Srinagar, the summer
capital of Indian-administered Kashmir (AP, HT, PTI). Security is said to be high across the valley, particularly in Shia areas.
New Year's in Kabul?
An
Afghan official said earlier today that in spite of daily violence in
Afghanistan, the tourism industry is up from last year, with around
12,000 visitors going to see the sites in Kabul, Bamyan, Parwan, and
other provinces (Pajhwok). Most of the tourists were from the U.S., Canada, Germany, France, Italy, and Norway. Bonus click: Afghanistan 2010 -- a year in photos (FP).
Sign up here to receive the daily brief in your inbox. Follow the AfPak Channel on Twitter and Facebook.
Obama's war review will be a whitewash
Obama’s war review will paper over the inability or unwillingness of US military to go after the root cause bedeviling war in Afghanistan.
The root cause bedeviling US Afghan war resides not in Afghanistan but in Pakistan as Karzai told a news conference in Kabul on 7/29/2010 after WikiLeaks leaks, “The time has come for our international allies to know that the war against terrorism is not in Afghanistan’s homes and villages. But rather this war is in the sanctuaries, funding centers and training places of terrorism which are in Pakistan. Our international allies have the ability to destroy these Pakistani sanctuaries, but the question is why they are not doing it?“
Afghanistan’s national security advisor Rangin Dadfar Spanta asked the similar question in a Washington Post article on 8/23/10: “While we are losing dozens of men and women to terrorist attacks every day, the terrorists’ main mentor (Pakistan) continues to receive billions of dollars in aid and assistance. How is this fundamental contradiction justified? Despite facing a growing domestic terror threat, Pakistan “continues to provide sanctuary and support to the Quetta Shura, the Haqqani network, the Hekmatyar group and Al Qaeda. Dismantling the terrorist infrastructure “requires confronting the state of Pakistan that still sees terrorism as a strategic asset and foreign policy tool”.
However American voters are tired of this Afghan imbroglio after nine long years of war and facing reelection bid in 2012, Obama will cut and run from Afghanistan, leaving it to Pakistan’s mercy.
With an ally like Pakistan, US had NO chance of winning in Afghanistan to begin with even after throwing away billions of dollars in aid to that terror center of the world.
Only questions left to be answered are
1. Will US continue to pump billions in Pakistan after US troop pull out?
2. If US does not, will Pakistan claim a US walk away and use it to restart the terror campaign as it did in 1996?
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE