Friday, October 1, 2010 - 3:04 PM

Even as the recently released tell-all Obama's Wars by Bob Woodward raises fresh doubts about the U.S.-Pakistan relationship and will likely stoke mistrust in the United States about Pakistan as a partner against the Afghan Taliban, a series of stories that paint the Pakistani army in a negative light will undoubtedly contribute to the tensions. These events occur against the backdrop of heightened U.S. drone activity inside Pakistan's border region and at least two reported NATO helicopter attacks on Pakistani soil. How the Pakistani army sees these events and addresses the ensuing challenges will have enormous impacts on the future trajectory of South Asia, as well as the direction of Pakistan's fragile democracy.
First, there was the reported kidnapping of The News journalist Umar Cheema and the standard operating procedures of Pakistani intelligence agencies used to humiliate and torture him, according to his detailed account of the incident. Other than denials, there does not appear to be a clear or detailed explanation from the government or the Inter Services Intelligence directorate, Pakistan's top spy agency, of who did this, nor any indication from the government that a rapid and credible public inquiry is underway. In the absence of such actions, rumors will fly and allegations will be made that will undermine the state and its agencies.
Second, there has been a new viral video released on the Internet purporting to be a record of extrajudicial killing of blindfolded Pashtun captives in civilian clothes by Urdu-speaking (that is, non-Pashtun) soldiers in army uniforms and carrying standard army weapons. The presence of a senior person identified in the soundtrack as "Tanveer Sahib" may implicate an officer in this incident. According to the New York Times, the Pakistani military initially dismissed the video as a forgery. The Times later reported that the army had investigated the incident, found it to be genuine, and promised to act against the perpetrators.
Fairly or not, this video and other negative stories about the army's operations and its behind-the-scenes role in Pakistani politics will likely be seen within Pakistan as coordinated and hostile actions from outside Pakistan to put pressure on the Pakistan army to bend to U.S. demands on a number of fronts. The army's readiness to move against the elements involved in these killings speaks to its new and informed leadership. Similar reports of extrajudicial killings in East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, in 1971 were brushed aside by the army at that time. They lost the hearts and minds of the local population, fuelled an insurgency, and created a refugee stream into India that drew that country into invading East Pakistan to help create Bangladesh. By contrast, in June 1992, an incident in Sindh province earlier described by the army in Sindh as an "encounter" with local robbers was openly investigated by the army high command, following a BBC report of killings by an army major as a favor to a local landlord. The major was court-martialed and sentenced to death. Senior officers who failed to investigate the incident adequately and participated in covering it up were removed or dismissed to much public acclaim. The army's stock went up in the public eye.
The current army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, will need to confront this latest allegation head-on and quickly rather than let it simmer and adversely affect public support for the military as well as morale inside the institution. If a "rogue officer" was at work giving his troops an unlawful command to murder civilian prisoners, then the army needs to clear it up in a manner that will identify and bring to court the culprits and help educate the rest of its officers and troops against similar actions. At a time when the civilian government is under stress and economic and political problems have besieged it, it is important that the army is seen as a stable entity working with the government for the common good.
General Kayani also faces a challenge on the border from the U.S. and NATO. A first incursion into Pakistan seemed to have been handled quickly by him and Adm. Mike Mullen to reduce unhappiness on the Pakistan side. They spoke and decided not to add to the public rhetoric. But now an additional incident in Kurram involving a NATO helicopter attack that reportedly killed three soldiers of the Frontier Corps, the paramilitary force that patrols the tribal areas, has led to the closing of the border to NATO supplies for Afghanistan and a public rebuke from the government of Pakistan.
This situation could easily careen out of control. The Obama administration, which is unhappy with what it perceives as Pakistan's lack of action against anti-American militants, is seriously miscalculating if it is using such tactics to pressure Pakistan to launch operations against its will. Better to argue your case behind closed doors, as allies should -- or risk a public split. Similarly, Pakistan risks overestimating its leverage over the United States and NATO by shutting down the coalition's supply routes across the Durand Line. If anything, this embargo will accelerate the U.S. drive to diversify its logistics chain -- while taking money out of Pakistanis' pockets.
There is some positive news. On Thursday, Kayani announced a fresh list of newly promoted three-star generals, completing his team of senior officers who will outlast his own new three-year term at the helm of the army. By all accounts, he has chosen tried and tested professionals and superseded some Musharraf loyalists. As with the lieutenant generals promoted in April, he has by and large selected apolitical and professional soldiers with a broad, mature view of the world and of Pakistan's place in it. Many of them have topped their classes at the military academy, winning the Sword of Honour, or have attended advanced military courses abroad, as has Kayani. Here's hoping they get their chance to prove that Pakistani's military can be a force for stability in South Asia, and a voice for the rule of law at home.
Shuja Nawaz is director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council and author of Crossed Swords: Pakistan, its Army, and the Wars Within and Pakistan in the Danger Zone: A Tenuous U.S.-Pakistan Relationship.
US loves to be duped by Pakistan
For once Shuja Nawaz is right - it does not matter who rules in Pakistan - civilian or military, they all are expert at blackmailing US.
Clearly Pakistan is NOT going to allow US Afghan mission to succeed unless Pakistan can dictate what that success includes.
Pakistan will only allow US/NATO drone strikes up to a point that prevents wipe out of Al Qaeda and Haqqani’s HQN. US has not dared to attack biggest headache for its Afghan mission, namely Mullah Omar’s QST safely operating from Quetta as reported by General McChrystal in his August, 2009 assessment to the President: The Quetta Shura Taliban (QST) based in Quetta, the provincial capital of Baluchistan, is the No. 1 threat to US/NATO mission in Afghanistan. At the operational level, the Quetta Shura conducts a formal campaign review each winter, after which Mullah Mohammed Omar (Afghan Taliban Chief) announces his guidance and intent for the coming year.
US Afghan mission is now run through Islamabad since US has neither the resources nor the desire to take on Pakistan. What a pitiful giant Pakistan has made out of US!
Pakistan boldly holds the Western world to ransom. It garners generous financial aid and military supplies from the US and has successfully projected itself as recourse of last resort in its geographical theatre. It runs circles around international sanctions and bans by nurturing a large number of home-grown terrorist outfits forever changing nomenclature. In addition, it maintains seemingly endless pool of freelance non-state actors that allow it the fig-leaf of plausible deniability.
And in a masterful demonstration of how to manage chaos, Pakistan keeps its domestic situation in destabilized ferment and flux by stoking sectarian, that is, Sunni versus Shiite violence, and religious tensions between Islamic progressives and fundamentalists.
For the further bamboozling of the West, Pakistan uses its blow-hot-blow-cold relationship with the Pakistani and Afghan Taliban and its hosting of the Al Qaeda as adroit bargaining chips.
Pakistan also blackmails US by hinting menacingly about the possibility of its nuclear weapons falling to the Taliban as well.
While maligning Pakistan on jihadi culture, home grown terrorists and non state actors why people forget that Pakistan was subjected to these evils by CIA and Western Block in 1980's to fight against USSR. After acheiving their aims against USSR, Western World was contended enough to abandon Pakistan on the mercy of this monster and live a peaceful life thousands of miles away.
Pakistan has paid a huge price of collaborating with Western War against USSR and still Pakistani Policy makers have not learned from the past. Rather assuming the postion of front line state in War against Terror, was it not a better course to remain neutral in this conflict? yes of course it was a better option, from a Pakistani perspective if you see.
Pakistan has paid a price of economic loss worth 45 billion dollars , more than 12000 civilian casualities, more than 3000 soldiers killed, more than 150 suicide attacks on its citizens so far in this Western War . Did Us and Western alliescompensated Pakistan this much? no...... certainly not...!!!!!
Western World should see Pakistan as a Partner not as a settilite state to coerce in acheiving their objectives. They should safeguard Pakistani Interests in the region rather than threaten to bomb into stone age If their demands are not fulfilled.! Unless the Pakistani Interests are not looked after in the region, a vibrent media, an independent judiciary and more informed public may not allow any govt to bow infront of Western allies.
I think those days are gone, when a dictator kept all the institutions in his firm grip and massed ignorent and decide what ever he feels like..... The World should accept a changing Pakistan making heard its own voice....
Once again the same old paradigm. write what people have been brainwashed into believing. any alternative opinion from a genuine stake holder,dismiss as paranoia. Allow a superpower to put window dressing on its defeat in Iraq and Aghanistan having spent hundreds of billions on their much vaunted military but pummel the Pak Army for being soft on the Taliban despite their huge achievements and victories in the war on terror. They should not be fools to fight on for 5 or 6 billion dollars.
Pakistan to the US: We have not changed our outlook, but while we contemplate to do so please make sure we receive the next bagful of cash, weapons and aid. Psst, please throw in some green-cards in that bag for our dear ones to sweeten the deal.
US to the world: Pakistan is our ally and we will give 'all' the support it needs. (Goodies are given to Pakistan).
Few months, few more terrorists attacks, and many more deaths later:
US to Pakistan: Since we last discussed, nothing has changed. Are we on the same page? What more you need, dear ally?
Pakistan to the US: Who said we were going to take action; we said we were contemplating to do so. You see, we're a complex democracy with nukes. We expect to be treated with more respect worthy of a great Islamic power. I'm sure you do not want to let jihadis take over Pakistan now, do you? Also, remember that you still have not repaid us of your sins of leaving us in the dark soon after the soviets left.
However, this time if you really want our partnership it will take more time and more money. Did we say more money? Yeah. More weapons too - frigates, F-16's, submarines etc. to fight the Taliban, of course. Here is the situation: now some Talibs, who are killing your troops, are our allies. We cannot harm our brothas. What you call terror sanctuaries we call them prayer centers. We will take care of them according to our special ways as per our timeline. Meanwhile, let us start thinking big. How about a nuclear deal? We are a great Islamic power, you know.
What a joke! This mission is a farce.
With an ally like Pakistan, our ten year mission in Afghanistan looks increasingly like it's doomed to failure - and a humiliating one at that. We started with a limited premise: capture OBL and his crew and drive out his Taliban hosts, to minimize the possibility that Afghanistan could be used as a training base for future terrorism attacks on the west. That mission failed when OBL and al Qaeda moved across the border into Pakistan. Over the years, the mission has become one of building a nation where one has not existed for decades, with a government that would not survive unless it was hiding behind western armed forces.
The failure to pacify one square mile of Afghanistan (beyond Kabul) and the growing reach of the Taliban into areas they did not control previously should be clues that we have failed. The response - another surge - but this time without anything like the Sunni Awakening to make the job easier. The bribes we pay to local tribal leaders cannot buy their commitment to a government in Kabul that is viewed as unredeemingly corrupt and a US puppet as well.
The increasing strife with Pakistan over our attempts to conduct military operations against al Qaeda and Taliban leaders in their country gets us closer to an expansion of the war into that country, perhaps unintended and certainly without the informed consent of the US electorate. It is apparent the US military is frustrated by its inability to grapple with the forces that kill our troops then retreat back across the border. Afghanistan should be encouraged to make peace with its own Taliban - then left to Pakistan and India.
Pakistan should make sure that US is not very unhappy so that they can continue to get their money and have a peaceful rise to a prosperous nation. Money from the Americans makes up 90% of Pakistan's GDP, so Pakistan should take care of its economy by keeping Americans happy.
(6)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE