Tuesday, September 21, 2010 - 5:15 PM

While the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops have been using air power against the Taliban and other militant groups in Afghanistan, Pakistani troops in recent operations have resorted to the same tactics, tactics which have resulted in few gains and a rising civilian death toll. Particularly in ongoing military operations in the troubled Waziristan region, and lately in the Khyber Agency, these strikes are beginning to spur a major reaction amongst local populations; in one such strike in April, which later prompted an apology from the Pakistani army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani, over 70 civilians were killed in the remote Tirah Valley of Khyber tribal agency, a mountainous area between Khyber and Orakzai agencies and on the border with Afghanistan.
While the April incident sparked widespread anger from the local population, at
the same time the Pakistani press lauded Kayani for his public statement requesting
an apology from the victims of the ‘mistaken' bombing. However, to the dismay
of many, particularly the tribesmen and elders from Tirah, another ‘mistaken'
bombing on August 31 killed dozens
of civilians, though the exact number is not known due to remoteness of the
area.
Both strikes targeted the head of a Lashkar-e-Islam, Mangal Bagh, who escaped both
times; however, while the people of Tirah accepted the apology of the Pakistani
army chief the first time, they are in no mood to be as generous after the
second failed strike.
Bagh, the bus driver turned militant leader who ran an army of volunteers in
Bara area of Khyber Agency, located just 15 kilometers south-east of Peshawar
as recently as 2009, is not the first militant commander to have evaded arrest
or bombing.
The Waziristan-based
Hakimullah Mehsud and his key commanders, Bajaur-based
Maulvi Faqir Muhammad, Mohmand-based
Abul Wali (alias Omar Khalid) and Maulana Fazlullah of Swat,
have already escaped such strikes before. And instead of curtailing their
operations in face of a more aggressive Pakistani military effort, these
militant leaders have broken the cordon of the security forces around their
respective agencies to stage new attacks against the Pakistani government, army
and people in the country's heartland and major cities.
Despite being ill-equipped, surrounded and observed constantly, these leaders managed
to escape each time Pakistani forces surrounded their sanctuaries. Their
evasions not only frustrated the efforts of the Pakistani army, but also
deepened the awe and fear the militant commanders inspire among regular
Pakistanis. On the one hand, civilians are fed up with the nearly daily
bombings, targeted killings, harassment and kidnappings perpetrated by the
militants. But as more civilians die in failed attempts to kill militants with
no visible progress in curtailing militant activities, support for the
government among the population decreases.
Indeed, because of the government's inability to eliminate militant groups and
their leaders, the people in the Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (FATA)
continue to feel threatened and intimidated. A massive operation in May 2009 in
Swat against Maulana Fazlullah and his brigades of gun-wielding men was no
doubt a success for the Pakistan
army. Yet even a year later, Swat cannot be called "safe"; Fazlullah is still alive
as evidenced by his video
address to a ‘squad of suicide bombers,' later released to the Pakistani
media (a copy is also in the author's possession). These remarks, made at an
undisclosed location, are enough for the people of Swat to be reminded of his
presence, and fear his eventual return.
A similar operation conducted in South
Waziristan in October 2009 claimed a landmark
victory against the militants led by Hakimullah Mehsud, Qari Hussain and
Wali-ur-Rehman. Yet suicide bombings and targeted killings in and around the
region are still rampant. The August suicide blast on a
mosque in South Waziristan that killed former lawmaker Maulvi Noor Muhammad, the
May attack on
former parliamentarian Maulana Merajuddin and the blast
earlier this month at a police station in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa's Lakki Marwat all
point to the persistent strength of the militants in the area.
Instead of showing signs of weakness, the emboldened militants are now staging
attacks in cities like Peshawar, Lahore, Karachi and even
the country's central capital Islamabad.
From the daring attack on the
Sri Lankan cricket team in the country's eastern city of Lahore in 2009 to the devastating
multiple suicide blasts in the same city on a procession of Shia mourners
on September 1 and the recent blasts in Peshawar and Lakki Marwat, one can not
say with authority that the Taliban are showing any signs of slowing down.
Rather, they are reaching the cities once considered safe. Looking at the marked
increase in Taliban-related violence in the Pakistani cities, one wonders about
the logic behind the recent statement of the country's Foreign Minister Shah
Mahmood Qureshi saying the increase in violence was reaction to the ‘successful
operations' against the Taliban.
Judging on the basis of the spike in violence and the intensity of the attacks,
it is easy to presume that the militants are on the offensive. And this
aggressive posture is linked to the fact that the militant leadership is still
alive despite the use of all available resources to hunt them, from jet
bombings, to artillery shelling and large-scale incursions into the militants'
territory.
In such a situation, the repercussions are getting grim for the government and
the army when a mistaken bombing claim civilian lives, creating pockets of
support for the militants instead of rooting them out.
Daud Khattak is a Pashtun journalist currently working for the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Pashto-language station Radio Mashaal.
Remember: this is an opportunity to NOT post. The first step in recovery is admitting you have a problem.
OK. I think the assessment is pretty clear, but is missing some crucial elements - are there no questions to be asked here?
Are there alternatives that should be considered? And what are the problems with these choices?
In the past, the Army and ISI have generally 'bought off' these groups, or made agreements to leave each other alone. That has become increasingly untenable.
In other cases, there have been more serious military endeavors (such as in Swat) where the militants were routed by larger-scale military operations; but as you point out, these were quickly stepped back, allowing militant networks to remain functional, potentially remaining a threat in the region.
You say that of the methods tried thus far, none have achieved anything like complete success; but have any really ever been designed to achieve complete success? Efforts thus far by Pakistan's military have been a hodgepodge of limited operations, negotiations, and targeted killings. What I would call in every case, "halfway measures".
It is not clear that the will to pursue people like Mehsud has extended to the point where the Army is willing to engage any significant force for an extended period of time to achieve a specific outcome. There have been occasional operations, but nothing to the extent of what one would consider a real military effort to achieve a broad strategic goal. More like shows of force to keep occasional bargaining partners in line.
And regarding the murders of civilians... I think it is a dangerous thing for a country to take responsibility for targeted killings of its own people, and killing innocents accidentally. Better - so far, although I don't know how long they can continue - to blame America for all the civilian deaths...
But then of course, the Taliban/LeT/Mehsudis, etc. seem to have no problems blowing up mosques and temples and taking credit. The question seems to be a matter of "who is killing more civilians, and who is doing it intentionally vs. unintentionally?". I suppose it may not matter, politically (the taliban don't need to get elected)... But again - the question is, is 'everything that can be done being done?' 'Is there not a better way'? This piece seems to be a nice summation of the facts of the moment, and that things do not look good... but also lacking any angle of interest in the larger question at hand: is getting rid of these suicide-bombing extremists a goal that Pakistan believes is necessary? Or is it something that will be eventually dealt with by accommodation? It seems unclear. The point being made seems to be that "the status quo is not getting anywhere". This makes sense. Then what are the choices, if any? All I get from this is that there is little faith in the government of Pakistan. Big surprise! What I see to be lacking is a greater concern from a citizen's point of view as to how Pakistanis are supposed to feel about being a country where extremists kill citizens at will and exist partly with the passive acceptance of their military.
... (cue 10 seconds for Marty to do his thing)
Pakistani military lets militants thrive intentionally
It is by design that Pakistani military and ISI are letting militants thrive.
Let us NOT forget that nobody forced it but Pakistani Army and ISI created what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called 'this jihadist Frankenstein monster' on their own with full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments during 1990s.
Sandy Berger, Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in 2004 that Pakistani Army was the ‘midwife’ of Taliban. UN report on Bhutto killing published in April, 2010 confirmed this fact when it stated that ‘Pakistani Army organized Taliban movement and installed Taliban government in Afghanistan in 1996.’
But US government and news media intentionally continue to ignore Taliban’s Pakistani connections in fueling and sustaining Afghan insurgency as reported by Matt Waldman in ‘The sun in the sky‘ on 6/13/10, corroborated by WikiLeaks leaks on 7/25/10 and then further corroborated by Chris Alexander, Canadian ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005 and Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Afghanistan from 2005 until 2009 in his article on 7/30/10 titled ‘The huge scale of Pakistan‘s complicity‘.
All American officers in southern Afghanistan know that they can not prevail in the ongoing military operations, unless Taliban strongholds across the Durand Line in North Waziristan and Baluchistan are neutralized. Adm Mullen and Gen Patraeus evidently do not want to acknowledge that hard options have to be considered if their soldiers are not to die at the hands of radicals, armed and trained across the Durand Line. This is where rubber meets the road for the famous General.
As Matt Waldman reported, “support for the Afghan Taliban is ‘official Pakistani ISI policy’ and is backed at the highest levels of Pakistan’s civilian administration. Pakistan appears to be playing a double game of astonishing magnitude. There is thus a strong case that the ISI orchestrates, sustains and shapes the overall insurgent campaign in Afghanistan.”
The ISI is said to compensate families of suicide bombers to the tune of 200,000 Pakistani rupees, claims the report. Thus US aid to bankrupt Pakistan finances the death of US/NATO soldiers in Afghanistan. So in a way, US is financing the death of its own troops in Afghanistan.
Pakistani government issued its usual denials just as it had denied umpteen times the existence of Mullah Mohammed Omar’s ‘Quetta Shura Taliban (QST)’ in the provincial capital Quetta of Baluchistan. But General Stanley McChrystal called QST as the biggest threat to US Afghan mission in his report to President Obama in August, 2009.
Pakistan has denied presence of Osama bin Laden on Pakistani soil umpteen times and just recently Adm Mike Mullen repeated in Islamabad that Osama is hiding in a very secure place in Pakistan.
The most breath-taking part of this sordid saga is that US is NOT holding Pakistan responsible for sheltering, protecting and supporting Haqqani’s HQN network and Mullah Omar’s QST network all these years while those networks have been causing daily deaths of US/NATO soldiers ever since 2002 even though Pakistan was SUPPOSED to have joined US fight against same Taliban back in 2001!
With US mollycoddling such a duplicitous ally, its Afghan mission is headed for failure with Pakistan reestablishing its writ by reinstalling Taliban rule.
Same old blame Pakistan cause America is always right
All facts cited in your response are one sided not only factually but morally as well. Wake up and get off this moral high horse. There are always two sides to a story, and peace, in this case world peace lies in understanding both sides. We are all citizens of the same world and everyone wants peace. Do you really think that Pakistan's Government, Army, Intelligence and People want to promote extremism and have terrorists being harboured in their country? In the simplistic world view you seem to have where the West and America is King, probably aided by the biased and often incorrect reports by your media......such pompous thoughts seem to be the norm and they also seem to be the reason why there is more terrorism in the world now, why America is failing in Afghanistan and why terrorists are getting stronger.
The article above is also part of the problem. Why could the author have not mentioned that militants hide in civilian populations, holding them hostage so the can not be attacked, and when they are attacked then the Army is made to look bad in case of civilian deaths. The same media can also blame the militants for endangering the civilians? But then again the Western press will only print such articles that make Pakistan look bad. That seems to be the policy and hence no one in Pakistan trusts America or any Western power.
You seem to forget that more Pakistani soldiers, security personnel and civilians have been killed in this war. You really have to be messed in the head to believe that this is the intentional policy of Pakistan. One can very easily turn around and say it is the intentional policy of certain powers to destablize Pakistan by funding extremisim and terrorism inside Pakistan, and at the same time manipulate minds of Western people via media to think Pakistan is the problem. The end goal being to have permanent US and NATO bases inside Pakistan to have more of the world under your control.
By this logic the US and other countries that are its allies are the duplicitious ally and have ulterior motives.
Marty you really need to get off Pakistan's back and your stand that you are right. Pakistanis are also human beings. They fought hard for their independence and will not give it up. Either you are with Pakistan in fighting the terrorists that kill them everyday or you are not. It is time for people like you to step up, open your minds and DO MORE TO GENUINELY HELP Pakistan.
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE