Friday, August 6, 2010 - 3:22 PM

The document trove published by WikiLeaks reignited lingering suspicions that Pakistan's leaders haven't been completely forthright in their public support for the U.S.-led efforts in Afghanistan. The reaction from Pakistani officials to these renewed suspicions has been predictably indignant.
Reading the reports made public on WikiLeaks from outside Pakistan, it's easy to believe that extremism and terrorism in the region could be stopped almost immediately, if only Pakistan would fully commit to the effort. The reality, however, is much more complicated. At a recent conference hosted in Islamabad by the Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS) and the United States Institute of Peace Pakistani researchers showed that the drivers of extremist violence in the region are intertwined with Pakistan's political and economic organization.
Extremism in Pakistan is linked to extremism in Afghanistan. And at the core of Pakistan's extremism problem, the researchers concluded, is bad governance. If that is true, the solution lies beyond the capacity of Pakistan's military men or politicians.
Pakistan's population is largely poor and there is little chance that someone born into a lower or middle-income household will move up the social ladder through legal channels. And while laboring through everyday life, interaction with state services for the average Pakistani is likely to result in a demand for bribes or casual mistreatment. If the average Pakistani is in need of help, the security organs of the state are more likely to abuse than protect.
The devastating floods in Pakistan provide a stark example of this government inaction. News reports indicate that 1,600 have died and another 4.5 million affected directly by the flooding. While popular anger grows due to a government perceived as slow and ineffectual, President Asif Ali Zardari has provoked further furor by continuing with an expensive and luxurious European tour.
The researchers at the conference pointed out that although polling shows actual support for the aims and methods of extremists in Pakistan is relatively low, violent extremism is more widespread than in other Muslim countries due to its greater concentration of extremist groups.
"If you want to believe the extremist narrative and want to fight, you will be able to find people to facilitate you," said Moeed Yusuf of the United States Institute of Peace.
The floods again illustrate the point. Jamat-ud-Dawa, ostensibly banned and believed to be a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba is reported to be providing relief to victims of the flood. Not only are extremist groups easy to find, they stand in for the state in times of crisis.
The result of the long and short-term effects of poor governance, the researchers added, is that the underlying causes driving extremism are spreading throughout Pakistan, even though its religious ideology has not been traditionally widespread in the country.
Noting that "sharia is like a unicorn," Ijaz Haider went on to say that Pakistan contained so many understandings of Islam that they could almost be considered separate religions, which made it increasingly dangerous that Pakistanis were becoming comfortable with denouncing Islamic interpretations with which they didn't agree.
While the researchers agreed that the U.S.-led operation in Afghanistan provided a catalyst and focus for extremism in Pakistan, the real problem is that a military solution alone, whether from Pakistan or the United States, cannot reverse extremism.
Journalist and researcher Wajahat Ali, for instance, said that the ideology of extremism would have to be challenged by other ideas. "The fight against extremism will be fought in the craggy mountains of Waziristan but it will be won in the newsrooms," he said.
Yet the challenges ahead are enormous. The economy would need to grow at five percent a year just to employ the young people entering the workforce. In addition to new job seekers, alternative employment would need to be found for the huge number of Pakistanis who can no longer count - as they have done in the past - on Gulf Arab economies to provide employment. Provisions will also have to be made to peacefully integrate the millions of Pakistanis who will move from rural areas to the country's poor urban areas, seen around the world as fonts of radical politics.
The problem, however, is not in diagnosing Pakistan's problems but actually solving them. The PIPS conference showed that Pakistan is not short of insightful and rigorous researchers and intellectuals who are better -equipped and -placed to diagnose the sources of extremism in Pakistan that many of those abroad. However, they are as removed from the decision makers as those suffering from the floods. The difficulty in moving towards governance reform is only compounded by international interventions that seek to further cement the power of Pakistan's incumbent, mostly military elites. The history of U.S. material and moral support to well-connected feudal lords and military officials is so long that USAID seems to be having trouble today trying to identify Pakistani civil society to work with.
The most telling indication of how difficult achieving good governance will be in Pakistan were the comments by Sherry Rehman, a senior member of the ruling Pakistani People's Party (PPP) and a former minister of information.
In answer to a comment about lack of government planning, Ms. Rehman said; "Governments don't plan for the next 40 years. That's true. This is because they are worried about getting thrown out in the coming year."
If the international community does not help Pakistan move beyond zero-sum politics, it will find that no amount of cajoling and threatening Pakistan's political elites is going to work. It's outside any one group's power to change the toxic mix of problems successive Pakistani governments and their friends have allowed to fester.
Amil Khan works in Pakistan for Radical Middle Way and writes on issues connected to terrorism and extremism as Londonstani on the Abu Muqawama blog. His book about the development of extremism, The Long Struggle, will be published later this year.
A Majeed/AFP/Getty Images
EXPLORE:AFPAK, AFPAK CHANNEL, AL QAEDA, DEVELOPMENT, PAKISTAN, TALIBAN, TERRORISM, U.S. FOREIGN POLICY
Occam's Razor is sorely missing!
This analysis is once again an exercise in contortion of reasoning.
The social and economic organization of Pakistan is almost identical with atleast half the countries in the world ( Including India!!)
Abject poverty living under a thin sliver of super rich, uncontrolled population growth, absence of rule of law. A terrible burden of history. A sense of lost glory. The story is common, ( India, China 20 years ago, South Africa)
There is one thing that is different. Religion! A nation-state that defines itself in religious terms. Where no one is allowed to question the "fundamentals" of their tenet. Where The religion is taken in the absolute as " the complete code of life" "the ultimate truth".
In fact an interesting juxtaposition is that with the Arabs. Mostly a rich, largely law abiding, well fed and well cared for society. They have but one thing common with Pakistan!
What happened to these great scientific minds.?The same shackles that bound our Pakistani brothers! No innovation has come out of Arabia for many centuries. These are the folks who gave us Al-Jbr and al-Kharizami
The solution to Pakistan's problems lie in "Ijtehad". Question everything, rebel against what has shackled your mind. This is a land of talented people. From Panini to Abdus Salam. Wake up and claim your rightful place in the society of innovators. Climb on those giants and discover the power within you.
Re: "A terrible burden of history..."
If it is good governance that Pakistan so desperately needs, why is Obama shipping them shiploads of lethal arms and nuclear capable F-16's? Not to mention billions of dollars that eventually find their way to the militants shooting at our troops or to enrich the corrupt fascists who rule Pakistan?
TRYINGTOBERATIONAL above bemoans Pakistan's "terrible burden of history" as if Pakistan was a mute spectator while each day of this history was recorded with the blood of innocent lives that its military-militant cabal has spilled.
Problem is Pakistan's educational system
‘The core of Pakistan’s extremism problem’ is NOT ‘bad governance’ as theorized by Pakistani researchers at a recent conference in Islamabad organized by Pakistan Institute for peace studies (PIPS) and US institute of peace. Pakistani Army owns the Pakistani state and has molded it along Islamic fundamentalist principles for a long time.
The core of Pakistan’s extremism problem is rooted in its Islamic fundamentalist main stream educational system that was instituted way back in 1976. It has molded Pakistani minds ever since.
It is NOT just madrassas, but even the main-stream educational system in Pakistan is radicalized by Islamic teaching that projects Islam as the only savior in the world. Pakistan is suffering from ‘Saudization’ of its society by the education system that was revised in 1976 by the act of its parliament that, like Saudi Arabia’s system, provides an ideological foundation for violence and future jihadists. It demands that Islam be understood as a complete code of life, and creates in the mind of a school-going child a sense of siege and embattlement by stressing that Islam is under threat everywhere.
For all his hypocritical talk of “enlightened moderation,” General Musharraf’s educational curriculum was far from enlightening. It was a slightly toned down version of the curriculum that existed under Nawaz Sharif which, in turn, was identical to that under Benazir Bhutto who had inherited it from General Zia-ul-Haq. Fearful of taking on the powerful religious forces, every incumbent government has refused to take a position on the curriculum and thus quietly allowed young minds to be molded by fanatics.
The promotion of militarism in Pakistan’s so-called “secular” public schools, colleges and universities had a profound effect upon young minds. Militant jihad became part of the culture on college and university campuses. Armed groups flourished, they invited students for jihad in Kashmir and Afghanistan, set up offices throughout the country, collected funds at Friday prayers and declared a war which knew no borders.
Not long ago, Pervez Hoodhbhoy, a professor in Islamabad University wrote the following:
For three decades, deep tectonic forces have been silently tearing Pakistan away from the Indian subcontinent and driving it towards the Arabian peninsula. This continental drift is not physical but cultural, driven by a belief that Pakistan must exchange its South Asian identity for an Arab-Muslim one. This change is by design. Twenty-five years ago, the Pakistani state used Islam as an instrument of state policy. Prayers in government departments were deemed compulsory, floggings were carried out publicly, punishments were meted out to those who did not fast in Ramadan, selection for academic posts in universities required that the candidate demonstrate a knowledge of Islamic teachings and jihad was declared essential for every Muslim. Today, government intervention is no longer needed because of a spontaneous groundswell of Islamic zeal. The notion of an Islamic state – still in an amorphous and diffused form – is more popular now than ever before as people look desperately for miracles to rescue a failing state.
Problems with Pakistani Identity
Pakistan was created to be Not India. Pakistanis are taught in school to hate India and Hindus. Pakistani military is obsessed with desire to harm India. Islamic supremacism against Hindu India is the openly stated cultural and political foundation of the state of Pakistan.
Most civilizations - whether secular, Christian, Hindu or Chinese are moving towards the principle of - Do No Harm. That is not the case with Islam or Pakistan. They are on a road to destruction both for themselves and others.
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE