The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

A new, new Taliban front?

By Thomas Ruttig, June 21, 2010 Share

The Taliban successfully have infiltrated northern and northeastern Afghanistan and destabilized certain areas, mainly in Kunduz province. Now, there are signs that they might attempt to push forward into mainly Hazara-settled areas in the central region. The main road into Jaghori, an important Hazara area, has been blocked, raising fears of a new economic blockade or event an attack.

The Taliban might plan an advance into the central region of the Hazarajat, one of the last areas of the country that hitherto have only been marginally affected by insurgent activities. This has been reported by Kabul-based Hasht-e Sobh daily last Thursday (‘Taleban dar pay-e nufuz ba munateq-e markazi / Taliban begin to influence central areas’) on the basis of Taliban nightletters distributed at the border of Qarabagh and Jaghori districts, in southeastern Hazarajat. Both districts belong to Ghazni province but the border between them marks the limit between Pashtun (Qarabagh) and Hazara-settled (Jaghori) areas.

The nightletters shown in the newspaper are handwritten (as they are often), carry the official letterhead of the Taliban Islamic Emirate’s Qarabagh district administration but are not dated. They declare the road linking Jaghori, through Qarabagh, with the Kabul-Kandahar section of the great Afghan ringroad closed. The traffic on this road, the quickest connection between Kabul where many Jaghori Hazaras live, and their area of origin has been difficult since at least two years but was made almost impossible in the last few months. This has forced travelers to take the detour through Kabul, Behsud and Nawur, increasing travel time between Ghazni city and Jaghori from three to 12 hours. Before, when the road was still open, travelers did not carry any paperwork with them that could indicate employment with foreign organizations and deleted phone numbers from their mobile phones before passing Qarabagh for the fear of Taliban makeshift roadblocks.

According to Hasht-e Sobh, commodity prices in Jaghori have already soared. The local population is afraid of a repetition of the Taliban blockade of Hazarajat in the late 1990s.

Most significantly, the Taliban nightletters also appeal to the local population, as Hasht-e Sobh writes, ‘not to prevent the [Taliban’s] entry into this area.’ This could be a sign for an imminent -- or at least a planned -- attack on Jaghori, a district that is characterized by relatively high standards of boys’ and girls’ education. The newspaper further quotes analysts who say that this might indicate ‘a new plan of the [Taliban] to expand their influence on the country’s central [mainly Hazara-populated] areas.’ This would follow successful inroads into the north and northeast of the country where insurgent activity has abruptly increased of late.

Most Hazaras had been hostile to the Taliban’s advance into their region in the 1990s after the movement that considered Shia non-Muslim had committed some mass murders against the minority group, for example in Mazar-e Sharif, Yakaolang (Bamian province) and at the Robatak Pass (Samangan). The Taliban conquered Bamian, the largest town in Hazarajat, late in their campaign that brought them control over more than 90 percent of Afghanistan’s territory in that period. It was supported by an agreement with one faction of the main Hazara party Hezb-e Wahdat, led by Ustad Muhammad Akbari (now an MP in Kabul), a rival of the leader of Wahdat’s main wing Abdul Karim Khalili (now a Vice President). Under this deal, Akbari’s fighters guaranteed that Bamian remained calm and accepted a presence of Kandahari Taieban in the town.

In the meantime, the Taliban have -- at least officially -- moderated their position vis-à-vis the Shia community. Mullah Omar has declared repeatedly that the movement would not tolerate any ‘sectarian’ bias. This can be interpreted as an attempt to woo the Hazara population that feels neglected by the central government in Kabul.

Apart from Qarabagh and Jaghori, Taliban activity in peripheral areas of the Hazarajat has increased markedly. Over the past months, sporadic Taliban attacks or fighting was reported from the Shibar Pass in Bamian province, from Sarepul in the north and Ghor in the West. In most of those areas, as in the Afghan north, the activity seems to origin in neighboring Pashtun areas.

Some of the most recent fighting took place in Kejran district in western Daikondi, when large groups of Taliban fighters who had gathered in neighbouring Baghran district attacked a police post not far from the district centre in the night of June 12. The attackers were repelled by the police and local forces, leaving behind 16 dead, and the fighting that had lasted a few days has for the moment stopped. Inhabitants however report that several hundred Taliban fighters are still gathered and ready for renewed attacks, particularly after reports of exaggerated violence against them by the Hazara defenders. Kejran had been attacked before by the Taliban, in November 2007. Then, they even took the district center, but apparently prepared by a deal with one of the local government officials.

An earlier attack in Ghor had also seen the congregation of up to hundreds of Taliban fighters from the whole region and seem to represent a new development in the remote areas that seem to hold little importance for the coalition and government forces. Taliban involvement also was presumed in this year’s renewed clashes between settled Hazaras and incoming Pashtun nomads in Behsud and Daymirdad districts in Wardak/Maidan province.

These activities, however, cover a large area across different regions of the country which are under different parts of the Taliban's shadow administration. Coordination is, therefore, unlikely. If an attack on Jaghori happens, however, this could represent a major thrust of the Taleban that are well-established in the Pashtun-inhabited areas of Ghazni province.

Thomas Ruttig is the co-director of the Afghanistan Analysts Network, where this was originally published. He speaks Dari and Pashto.

Paula Bronstein/Getty Images

 

MATTMAN59

4:43 PM ET

June 21, 2010

Two questions. Will the

Two questions. Will the Hazaras ever submit with the Pashtun taliban again and does Omar really exercise a lot of control over the various elements leaving the "nightletters"?

 

CEOUNICOM

7:35 PM ET

June 21, 2010

Good questions...

From my limited information on the sitch... (a few books over the last few years)... My guess would be,

1) no. Taliban massacred Hazaras in central & northern Afghanistan, and the bad blood runs deep. However I dont really know, and wouldnt know who to ask who is an expert on this...

2) I'd guess no again. As they say, all politics is local, and as far as I can tell, the thing called "taliban" that Omar ran in the 90s is far more decentralized and fragmented today. Also, from what I picked up in Ghost Wars, he was not an 'operations' leader, but a spiritual figurehead. Afghans apparently often choose their leaders on occasion based on who will be the most pliable by the different factions. Not who is the strongest and exercises the most control. Just my 2cents.

 

CEOUNICOM

7:37 PM ET

June 21, 2010

Oh, and thank god...

...We had a single post that wasnt followed up by the cut-&-paste commentary of Suresh... or the racist rantings of Lal Qila. Its a good day.

So far.

 

SANSATHARVA

11:56 PM ET

June 21, 2010

Amen !

Amen !

 

CEOUNICOM

2:50 AM ET

June 26, 2010

Lal Qila:

Your apologist approach to people blowing themselves up and killing civilians trumps pretty much everything you've ever said.

You are a psychopathic idiot whose worldview is an example to all of exactly what we are trying to fight against. One day you might realize that you arent helping yourself at all through your polific postings... but I dont expect it to be anytime soon.

Say something about blackhindoojewnazis now, just to give us a laugh.

 

ARYABHAT

5:29 AM ET

June 22, 2010

Iran

This article focusses on Hazara areas within Afhganistan - excluding outside influence of Iran with which it shares a long and porous border. In recent history, it was Iran that supported Hazara resistance against Taliban when Taliban ruled 90% of Afghanistan.

Of course partly that was because Taliban at that time persecuted Hazaras for their Shia background - and Iranians are Shia majority. Besides ideology, oher part was that even at that time Iran did not want USA and Pakistan to succeed - which were supporting Taliban. While Mulla Omar is addressing lacuna in his old strategy of considering Shia Afghans as lesser muslims, and USA is no longer supporting Taliban - same can't be said for Pakistan. And no one can guarantee future intentions of Mulla Omar towards Shias/Hazaras IF he captures Afghanistan.

Sp perhaps in long run again, it would be Iran that would hold strong influence in Hazara region. May be one need to look at that perspective too.

 

SURESH SHETH

9:54 PM ET

June 22, 2010

US finances death of its own troops in Afghanistan

As long as US continues to ignore Taliban’s Pakistani connections, problems faced by US in its Afghan mission will continue to not only persist but compound.

As Times of London narrated on 6/13/2010 about Matt Waldman’s report titled ‘The sun in the sky’ from London School of Economics, “support for the Afghan Taliban is ‘official ISI policy’ and is backed at the highest levels of Pakistan’s civilian administration. Pakistan appears to be playing a double game of astonishing magnitude. There is thus a strong case that the ISI orchestrates, sustains and shapes the overall insurgent campaign in Afghanistan.”

The ISI is said to compensate families of suicide bombers to the tune of 200,000 Pakistani rupees, claims the report. Thus US aid to bankrupt Pakistan goes directly to finance the death of US/NATO soldiers in Afghanistan.

Pakistani government issued its usual denials just as it had denied umpteen times the existence of Mullah Mohammed Omar’s ‘Quetta Shura Taliban (QST)’ in the provincial capital Quetta of Baluchistan. But General Stanley McChrystal confirmed the existence of QST in his report to President Obama in August, 2009 as follows: ‘Quetta Shura Taliban (QST) based in Quetta , the provincial capital of Baluchistan, is the No. 1 threat to US/NATO mission in Afghanistan . At the operational level, the Quetta Shura conducts a formal campaign review each winter, after which Mullah Mohammed Omar (Afghan Taliban Chief) announces his guidance and intent for the coming year‘.

Can American CIA not know what Matt Waldman knows? How come Obama administration is continuing Bush’s mollycoddling of Pakistan with such incriminating evidence against Pakistan’s double game? How can US mission in Afghanistan succeed if Obama administration continues to ignore such Pakistani duplicity like Bush had done it before Obama?

 

ASHOK2718

1:35 AM ET

June 23, 2010

So what is it to you ?

why are you so worked up ? Their troops they can do whatever they want. I suggest you mind your own business

 

ARYABHAT

6:44 AM ET

June 23, 2010

@ Ashok

Same could be said to you and your Lalqila Kabalis! May be you should mind your own business instead of exporting terrorism to Afghanistan?

Funny this coming from "Ashok" that how Afhganistan is not India's problem - "Ashok"who should know that Kandhar was "Gandhar" - part of Bharat when Greek/Alexander came with troops. It was Chanakya that organised insurgency and not only removed Greek empire's control over these places but also created Bharat that later on "Ashok" inherited!!!!!!

Afghanistan WAS border nation state for India, IS an important friend and ally in which it has invested more then a Billion USD in civilian aid, and WILL be part of near neighbourhood of India and so an important country in its foreign policy.