Friday, May 7, 2010 - 10:35 AM
Among the many questions raised by Faisal Shahzad's failed
Times Square bombing attempt -- his possible links to the Pakistani Taliban,
his ability to board a plane despite being on a no-fly list -- one is
particularly vexing. How was Shahzad, despite receiving training in Pakistan,
so incompetent when it came to building and detonating a bomb?
A possible answer can be found in the trial of five Pakistani-Americans
arrested in Sargodha
last year for planning terrorist attacks. Their testimony revealed that they
had tried really hard to join the Pakistani Taliban but had been rebuffed at
every turn. Experts I spoke to at the time were not surprised; apparently, the
Taliban automatically assumes that any American who seeks to join their ranks
is a CIA spy.
In the case of Shahzad, it is entirely likely that the Taliban gave him only
rudimentary training and had no expectation that he would succeed. If the bomb
attack did go off, they get a major victory; if it failed, then no harm done.
If this is indeed what happened, then U.S. interrogators are unlikely to
get much intelligence out of Shahzad beyond the names of a few very low-level
Taliban members.
Nadir Hassan is a journalist for the Express Tribune, a recently launched English-language newspaper in Pakistan.
Pakistan was, is & always will be terror center of the world
The whitewash about the real culprits behind continuing terror threat from Pakistan in Western foreign policy establishment and news media continues.
Pakistani governments have been given an intentional free pass for their role in creating this global menace.
Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan
in 1996. Democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.
Ex-CIA official Bruce Riedel said in an interview on 1/29/2009 that ''In Pakistan, the jihadist Frankenstein monster that was created by the Pakistani army and the Pakistani intelligence service, is now increasingly turning on its creators. It's trying to take over the laboratory.'' Pakistani Army and Intelligence Service (ISI) chose to create this ‘jihadist Frankenstein monster’ with full blessings and financing by Pakistan’s democratic governments in 1990s.
Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in March, 2004 that ’Pakistani Army was the midwife of Taliban’.
Declassified DIA Washington D.C., "IIR (intelligence Information Report) Pakistan Involvement in Afghanistan," dated November 7, 1996 states how "Pakistan's ISI is heavily involved in Afghanistan," and also details different roles various ISI officers play in Afghanistan. Stating that Pakistan uses sizable numbers of its Pashtun-based Frontier Corps in Taliban-run operations in Afghanistan, the document clarifies that, "these Frontier Corps elements are utilized in command and control; training; and when necessary combat“.
Declassified U.S. Department of State, Cable "Pakistan Support for Taliban" from Islamabad dated Sept. 26, 2000 states that "while Pakistani support for the Taliban has been long-standing, the magnitude of recent support is unprecedented." In response Washington orders the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad to immediately confront Pakistani officials on the issue and to advise Islamabad that the U.S. has "seen reports that Pakistan is providing the Taliban with materiel, fuel, funding, technical assistance and military advisors. [The Department] also understand[s] that large numbers of Pakistani nationals have recently moved into Afghanistan to fight for the Taliban, apparently with the tacit acquiescence of the Pakistani government." Additional reports indicate that direct Pakistani involvement in Taliban military operations has increased.
For the American and other Western apologists who claim that ‘Pakistan is also the victim of terrorism’, following are some observations by UN report on Benazir Bhutto’s killing published on April 15, 2010:
- "The jihadi organizations are Sunni groups based largely in Punjab. Members of these groups aided the Taliban effort in Afghanistan at the behest of the ISI and later cultivated ties with Al-Qaida and Pakistani Taliban groups. A common characteristic of these jihadi groups was their adherence to the Deobandi Sunni sect of Islam, their strong anti-Shia bias, and their use by the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies in Afghanistan and Kashmir".
- "The PAKISTANI MILITARY ORGANIZED AND SUPPORTED THE TALIBAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF AFGHANISTAN IN 1996. These policies resulted in active linkages between elements of the military and the Establishment with radical Islamists, at the expense of national secular forces, and the entrenchment of religious extremist and other militant groups in the tribal areas and Punjab.
- “Elements within the Pakistani Establishment ……. retain links with radical Islamists, especially the militant jihadi and Taliban groups and are sympathetic to their cause or view them as strategic assets for asserting Pakistan’s role in the region. The ISI cultivated these relationships, initially in the context of the Cold War and the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan in the 1980’s and later in support of Kashmiri insurgents. WHILE SEVERAL PAKISTANI CURRENT AND FORMER INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS TOLD THE COMMISSION THAT THEIR AGENCIES NO LONGER HAD SUCH TIES IN 2007, VIRTUALLY ALL INDEPENDENT ANALYSTS PROVIDED INFORMATION TO THE CONTRARY AND AFFIRMED THE ONGOING NATURE OF MANY SUCH LINKS."
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE