Friday, May 7, 2010 - 10:36 AM
The key lesson from the Faisal Shahzad case so far is that Pakistan
severely needs to address the fact that the country has become a convenient
go-to place for anyone who has the slightest desire to turn toward militancy.
Whether it's the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan,
Jaish-e-Mohammad, or any of the other groups operating in south Punjab and Waziristan, Pakistan
needs to address these problems now. (However, we should still be cautious
before jumping to conclusions about whether these groups were actually
involved.) Pakistan is lucky
that the United States after
9/11 and India
after Mumbai did not bomb the country into oblivion. But at some point, some
country that is the target of an attack by a terrorist group that was trained
in or received support from Pakistan
will react.
Jumping into another immediate military offensive might not be the best idea,
however, given that there are still problems in the areas that were supposedly
cleared, and the ramifications of the refugee crises created by operations in
Swat and South Waziristan still linger, but Pakistan needs to move toward
serious military action. Creating more truces and "peace deals" with militants
in North Waziristan will only plug the hole in the dam for so long.
Saba Imtiaz works for the Express Tribune, an English-language newspaper in Pakistan.
One can either completely defeat the other side or negotiate a peace.
Pakistan, America, India, Russia, Israel can not completely defeat the other side, in their respective troubled areas, thus they must negotiate peace.
Learn from the Irish-English problem in Northern Ireland; what have they finally done; they have negotiated a peace.
"Pakistan is lucky that the United States after 9/11 and India after Mumbai did not bomb the country into oblivion."
The US and India are lucky you aren't in charge of their foreign policies. "Blow Pakistan into oblivion?"
Perhaps you should be introduced to the HATF-I, Abdali, Ghaznavi, M-11, Shaheen-I, Shaheen-II, Shaheen-III Ghauri-I, Ghauri-II, Ghauri-III, Babur and Ra'ad.
If anything explains the lack of action against Pakistan, it is one thing... their nuclear arsenal.
So wake up.
Otherwise these petty thieves and smugglers will bomb US and India. With what you ask ? With their special made in China bombs Ha ha. These people have bombs but no bread. Schools but no teachers and/or students. what can be more pitiful ? What have you done in 60 years of your freedom ? Exported terrorism ? Build hotels for terrorists to stay in ? built schools for terrorists where not just pakistanis are indoctrinated but now you people can boast of having teachers training Saudis, Nigerians, Uzbekis, Syrians, Egyptians and oh yeah, how can I forget a small minority from Kashmir.
You people are pathetic
say what you will.... but I guarantee you, not a single politician in India is retarded enough to invade Pakistan at this point.
Face it, nuclear deterrence works.
I suppose there's something to be said of the fact that in spite of all the shortcomings and errors you mentioned, they still have managed to neutralize the world's second most populous country, and prevented even a single soldier from the most powerful alliance in human history from setting foot on their soil.
There's genius in their evil.
I'm sure most Pakistanis already assume that India is behind a few terrorist attacks in Pakistan.
Most are definitely convinced that India is aiding Balochi seperatists. So it's not really a big deal if India tries to plant terrorists in Pakistan in retaliation for terror in India.
Pakistanis are obviously already used to these things.
And you only make my point for me in saying that all an elected politician in India (who was elected to slap back at Pakistan) could do is respond in kind.
You can't bomb Pakistan by missiles or by air. You definitely can't send troops. Why? Because nukes work.
So from Pakistan's perspective: mission accomplished.
I meant you two not Saba :)
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE