The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

The million dollar question: Who killed Benazir?

By Huma Imtiaz, April 14, 2010 Share

The last time I met Benazir Bhutto was a few weeks before her death. At her residence in Karachi, she addressed a press conference, wooing the media with her diplomatic replies. My last memory of her is Benazir signing a book for me, a chronology of the Pakistan People's Party's achievements over the last few decades. Soon after, I left for Lahore and it was there that my phone rang and I found out she'd been killed. The moon turned a reddish hue, the country went up in flames and millions wept.

Today, the U.N. commission, a fact-finding mission into the circumstances behind Benazir Bhutto's murder, released its findings. In a press conference, Permanent Representative of Chile to the U.N. and Head of the Commission Heraldo Munoz blamed the Musharraf government for not providing adequate security to Ms. Bhutto despite knowing the threats that she faced, and for impeding the investigation into the causes of her death. Additionally, they also blamed the Pakistan People's Party, saying the party had taken inadequate measures for her protection.

In the press conference, Heraldo Munoz referenced the Oct. 18, 2007 attack on Benazir's convoy as she returned to Karachi. According to the report:

The Sindh police investigation of the attack never advanced. A former high level ISI official told the Commission, however, that the ISI conducted its own investigation and near the end of October 2007, captured and detained four suspects from a militant cell; the whereabouts of these four could not be confirmed by the Commission as of March 2010.

O Suspects Where Art Thou

Now, on to the highlights of the report:

On 20 December [2007], the Military Operations Directorate informed Interior Secretary Syed Kamal Shah that Usama bin Laden had ordered the assassination of General Pervez Musharraf, Ms. Bhutto and Maulana Fazal ur Rahman, a religious and political leader. Another warned that an attack on Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Malik could be launched on 21 December.

This proves Munoz's point: if the Pakistani government at the time knew that Benazir had a specific threat (with a date that was just six days before the day of her actual death), why did they not take adequate measures to ensure Bhutto's security?

Secondly:

The Commission has reviewed one Interior Ministry letter, dated 22 October 2007, which is clearly a federal directive. Sent to all provincial governments, it orders them to provide stringent and specific security measures for Messrs. Shaukat Aziz and Chaudhry Shujat Hussain as ex-prime ministers. Both were from the PML-Q party and were General Musharraf's close allies. The annex to the Interior Ministry letter instructed provincial authorities to provide VVIP-level security for the two ex-prime ministers, listing the specific measures to be implemented. Despite a search of their archives, at the request of the Commission, Punjab provincial authorities could not find a similar directive from federal authorities in the case of Ms. Bhutto, also an ex-prime minister. The Commission was told by the then Interior Secretary Mr. Kamal Shah that the 22 October directive was the result of an instruction from Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz. When asked why no such directive was issued to safeguard Ms. Bhutto, he did not provide a clear answer, noting only that federal authorities had issued a directive on 18 October to Sindh provincial authorities to protect Ms. Bhutto when she arrived from exile. The Commission finds it inexcusable that federal authorities did not issue a similarly clear directive as the 22 October directive for ex-Prime Ministers Aziz and Hussain to protect Ms. Bhutto. This is all the more troubling as she had been attacked in Karachi just three days prior to the 22 October directive, and intelligence agencies had specific, ongoing and credible threats to her.

Shaukat Aziz should be grateful he's not in the country right now.

And it's not just the government that the Commission blames for the lack of security.

Despite considerable and valiant efforts by individual PPP members to protect Ms. Bhutto, the PPP as an organization was inadequate to handle the challenges. There was no person in overall charge of the PPP's provision of security. As a result, the PPP's security for Ms. Bhutto was characterized by a lack of direction and professionalism. However, the Commission reiterates that the responsibility for failing to protect Ms. Bhutto lies with the Government of Pakistan.

What might be potentially embarrassing for certain members of the ruling PPP is the Commission describing a Mercedes-Benz leaving before Benazir's convoy had left Liaquat Bagh that fateful evening.

The black bullet-proof Mercedes-Benz car was the first to leave the parking area. It is not clear how much distance there was between this vehicle and the rest of Ms. Bhutto's convoy at the moment of the blast. Credible reports range from 100 meters to 250 meters. Some of those in the car said that they were close enough to Ms. Bhutto's vehicle to feel the impact of the blast. Others at the site of the blast have said that the Mercedes-Benz left Liaquat Bagh so quickly that it was nowhere to be seen when the blast occurred. Indeed, the Commission has not seen this vehicle in the many video images of the exit area it reviewed. Despite the acknowledgement of some occupants of the vehicle that they felt the impact of the blast, the Commission finds it incredible that they drove all the way to Zardari House, a drive of about 20 minutes, before they became aware that Ms. Bhutto had been injured in the blast. They should have stopped at a safe distance when they felt the blast so as to check on Ms. Bhutto's condition, the condition of her vehicle and whether the back-up vehicle was required. Indeed, as the back-up vehicle, the Mercedes-Benz car would have been an essential element of Ms. Bhutto's convoy on the return trip even if the occupants of that car had confirmed that Ms. Bhutto had been unscathed in the attack.

The occupants of the car, ladies and gentlemen, were Interior Minister Rehman Malik, and Minister for Law Babar Awan. Conspiracy theorists will lap this bit up, considering how many plots one has heard in the past two years involving Benazir's widower, now-Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and his associates as accomplices to her murder. And as the report mentions, the occupants of the car, one of whom was "coordinating with Ms. Bhutto's private detail" should have stopped and verified if Ms. Bhutto was safe after the attack and frankly speaking, not raced on ahead to "welcome" her. 

The report also highlights how badly prepared Benazir's handpicked choices to handle her security were. The report describes this scene before the assassination attempt:

Major Imtiaz, who was sitting in the front seat of the Land Cruiser, said that he was worried that the convoy was being slowed down by the crowd. He wanted to call CPO Saud Aziz by cell phone, but he did not have the CPO's direct number.

Lest we forget: This is Pakistan, where every journalist and politician has the cell phone numbers of police officers on their cell phones. How did Major Imtiaz only have a landline number for Aziz?

And even though the report is appalled at the decision to destroy the crime scene by hosing it down, it reiterates:

The Commission is not convinced that the decision to wash the scene was made by CPO Saud Aziz alone. The attack was too significant and the target of the attack too important to Pakistani society to make such a decision solely on his level. Sources told the Commission that CPO Saud Aziz was constantly talking on his mobile phone while at the hospital. In the Commission's view, he has not adequately explained who called him during that time. Other sources have provided credible information about the intervention of intelligence agencies in the case. Whoever was responsible for this decision, and for whatever reason, acted in a manner that is contrary to the most basic police standards and hampered the proper investigation of the assassination.

"Establishment," the U.N. is looking at you.

Let us be clear: the U.N. Commission's mandate, as mentioned on Page 66 of the report, is "to determine the facts and circumstances of the assassination for former Prime Minister of Pakistan Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto." Answering questions after reading out the executive summary of the report, Heraldo Munoz denied conspiracy theories that Zardari was behind her death. Munoz also laid blame squarely at the feet of the police and the intelligence agencies, for not providing adequate security, preserving the crime scene, for not conducting an autopsy and for prematurely announcing that the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan leader Baitullah Mehsud was behind her death, which impeded the investigation. The commission also urged Pakistani authorities to investigate the financers, executors, and planners of the assassination of Ms. Bhutto.

Benazir Bhutto has been dead for more than two years now. The report, which hardly tells us anything new, will not help assuage the grief of the PPP supporters who loved Ms. Bhutto, unless the Government of Pakistan steps up in an effort to truly investigate the million dollar question: "Who Killed Benazir?" and also probes who bungled up the investigation. Until then, conspiracy theories, rumors, and the blame game will continue.

Huma Imtiaz works as a journalist in Pakistan.

John Moore/Getty Images

 

JAYDEE001

1:39 PM ET

April 16, 2010

Don't hold your breath

Benazir Bhutto was a burr under the saddle of the Pakistani regime for a long time. it would be foolish to believe that they wanted to make her safety a paramount goal. There were many in the Pakistani government who were relieved to be rid of her.

Implicating Usama bin Laden in a plot to kill her and others bears some requirement of proof. If he was involved, and the Pakistani military and interior security apparatus knew of it beforehand, that makes one wonder how they got the information - from bin Laden himself, or at his direction?

 

LAL QILA

2:05 PM ET

April 16, 2010

I liked Benazir, but...

I liked Benazir, but she had, after years of exile abroad, slid into the pocket of Americans a bit too much; many of our last statements were too provocative for a conservative country adjoining Afghanistan, were a bit too much for anybody with an ounce of sense.

Then, when one is in an armoured car, one stays inside the protection of the armour, not pop up her head up and try to be a peoples woman.

 

SURESH SHETH

2:21 PM ET

April 16, 2010

Benazir partly responsible for her own killing

‘Those who live by the sword, die by the sword’ as the saying goes.

UN report on Bhutto killing published yesterday stated that ‘The Pakistani military organized and supported the Taliban to take control of Afghanistan in 1996‘. Bhutto’s democratic government supported such a Pakistani Army move.

Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Bhutto’s democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.

Ex-CIA official Bruce Riedel said in an interview on 1/29/2009 that ''In Pakistan, the jihadist Frankenstein monster that was created by the Pakistani army and the Pakistani intelligence service, is now increasingly turning on its creators. It's trying to take over the laboratory.'' Pakistani Army and Intelligence Service (ISI) chose to create this ‘jihadist Frankenstein monster’ with full blessings and financing by Pakistan’s democratic governments in 1990s.

Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in March, 2004 that ’Pakistani Army was the midwife of Taliban’.

Declassified DIA Washington D.C., "IIR (intelligence Information Report) Pakistan Involvement in Afghanistan," dated November 7, 1996 states how "Pakistan's ISI is heavily involved in Afghanistan," and also details different roles various ISI officers play in Afghanistan. Stating that Pakistan uses sizable numbers of its Pashtun-based Frontier Corps in Taliban-run operations in Afghanistan, the document clarifies that, "these Frontier Corps elements are utilized in command and control; training; and when necessary combat“.

Declassified U.S. Department of State, Cable "Pakistan Support for Taliban" from Islamabad dated Sept. 26, 2000 states that "while Pakistani support for the Taliban has been long-standing, the magnitude of recent support is unprecedented." In response Washington orders the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad to immediately confront Pakistani officials on the issue and to advise Islamabad that the U.S. has "seen reports that Pakistan is providing the Taliban with materiel, fuel, funding, technical assistance and military advisors. [The Department] also understand[s] that large numbers of Pakistani nationals have recently moved into Afghanistan to fight for the Taliban, apparently with the tacit acquiescence of the Pakistani government." Additional reports indicate that direct Pakistani involvement in Taliban military operations has increased.

So in a way, Bhutto was partly responsible for her own death.

 

LAL QILA

3:31 PM ET

April 16, 2010

Suresh Sheth: A Hindoo Indian like you speaks like a Hindoo

Suresh Sheth: A Hindoo Indian like you speaks like a Hindoo Indian in classic anti-Pakistan everything. Do you ever give it a rest?

Now for the sake of American simpletons here:

(a) Why did Hindoo India's Tata's and Birlas pressured Mountbatten to carve Pakistan in such a way at Partition so badly that it was called "Moth Eaten" whilst retaining large swaths of Muslim areas in predominantly Hindoo India and thus effectively dividing the Muslim population in three parts (i) West Pakistan (ii) East Pakistan (iii) Muslims trapped in India as second class citizens?

(b) Why did Hindoo India invade Junagarh, Manavader, Hyderabad Deccan and Kashmir which were supposed to go with Pakistan at Partition and illegally annex them?

(c) Why did Hindoo India train Mukhti Bahani terrorists on its own soil; and then sent them over the border to East Pakistan to create political unrest; and then out rightly invading sovereign Pakistan (East Pakistan) all under the auspices of your corrupt Hindoo leader Indira Gandhi?

(d) Why did Hindoo India explode a nuclear bomb 22 miles from the border of Pakistan in 1974 and start the nuclear arms race in the Subcontinent?

(e) What is the real intent of Hindoo India behind all these classic over-clever Hindoo Baniya machinations?

 

ALI K.

2:35 PM ET

April 16, 2010

Hardly Anything New?

Sorry for being impertinent but I am sick of this kneejerk reaction to the UN report. The report DOES reveal important new information. Information which you have rather crassly skimmed over in your essay.

The part about the DG MI calling CPO Saud to tell him to hose down the crime scene, the fact that this is not usually done except when the military is in direct control of the crime scene, the fact that the UN concluded that the establishment hindering investigation,the fact that the ISI rarely shared any information it gained from its investigation with the police and civvies, the fact that Brig Cheema's pre-mature press conference ordered by Musharaff himself was conducted even before the Forensic team had inspected the car let alone been to the crime scene, the fact that the Forensic team visited the crime scene 2 full days after the BB's death AND even then only because they insisted that the CPO take them who was hesitant to do so, the fact that the CPO was legally obligated to have the autopsy performed;did not need Zardari's permission and that it was SOP to do so. (The relevant excepts can be found here: http://tiny.cc/zhpz2 )

Yes we knew before the report that there were security lapses and that the Musharraf government (not the PPP mind you) was responsible for BB's security. What is new and important is the extent to which the CPO and the agencies went to make sure the investigation into BB's assassination would not be effective.