The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

Motives behind the attack on U.S. consulate in Peshawar

By Imtiaz Gul Share

From Islamabad

The Monday attack on the U.S. consulate in Peshawar marked the first most-coordinated and well-planned direct strike on a U.S. interest in Pakistan. The combination of a suicide attack and the storming of the "heavily fortified" building by attackers reportedly disguised as members of a paramilitary force -- the Frontier Constabulary -- involved two vehicles and at least 100 kilograms of high-grade explosives. When the paramilitary, deployed to protect the consulate, tried to stop the attacking vehicles, the terrorists inside detonated the explosives , shattering windows of houses all around, and rocking homes as far as one kilometer away. 

The commando-style raid and the rocket fire made it abundantly clear that the U.S. consulate was the obvious target in a city that is located closest to the militants' main strongholds such as the Orakzai, Khyber, Mohmand, and Kurram tribal regions that surround Peshawar, and thus turning the city into a volatile nerve centre. In the last quarter of the last year, this city experienced a suicide bombing every 36 hours, according to the police chief Naveed Malik, triggering fears the Taliban might sweep it.

The latest attack has led to many questions such as: What was the driving motivation behind this kind of terrorist attack? Was it an act of despair or an expression of strength?

Analysts and Pakistani intelligence officials believe there could be several motives behind this strike which the militants used to:

  1. To distract the army from its operation in the neighboring Orakzai tribal region, where the army and the air force have been chasing militants with several self-casualties in recent weeks.
  2. Underscore their opposition to the United States and its allies because they believe Peshawar is being used as the staging post for the anti-terror campaign in the tribal regions bordering Afghanistan
  3. Project the militant power and disprove the government claims that the back of the militant network has been broken as a result of last October's South Waziristan operation.
  4. Underline they can hit and run at will, and penetrate even the most elaborate security cordon --like the one that surrounded the U.S. consulate. (It was a typical attack in which the first wave of attackers would distract the security forces by blowing up grenades or exploding the ammunition, and the second wave would attempt to storm the facility.)
  5. And lastly, display their contempt for the security apparatus that Islamist radicals believe are in cahoots with the United States security establishment.

Although the policing capacity within the embattled Northwestern Frontier Province (being renamed as Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa) and the paramilitary forces within the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) have also improved, yet it shall have to be backed up by electronic surveillance -- intelligence gathering -- to infiltrate the ranks of the militants, and thus undermine the planning of terrorism.

A very senior police official (who asked to remain anonymous), who also looked after an intelligence outfit until recently, says successfully fighting the insurgency would require comprehensive revamping of the civilian and military intelligence network. Unless we infiltrate their ranks, sporadic suicide and other attacks would be hard to prevent, he maintains.

The militants also proved once again that they can change tactics as and when necessary; they were reportedly wearing paramilitary forces fatigues, something that the attackers of the General Headquarter (GHQ), the heart of the army power, did on Oct.10, 2009 or the suicide bomber that blew up the U.N. (World Food Program) office on October 5, 2009 last year.

Most analysts agree that despite the relative successes the army secured in Swat and South Waziristan last year and the state institutions' improved level of response to the militant threat, Pakistan's security apparatus has a long way to go yet. Improved human and electronic intelligence gathering and a real profession reinforced policing apparatus would be the key to whittling down insurgency.

This post has been updated. 

A Majeed/AFP/Getty Images

 

NAZIA

1:21 PM ET

April 6, 2010

For the last seven years we

For the last seven years we are in this war and each year has brought more severity of this problem which was forced on us on the name of war on terror.
Our people have been tired and fed up of round the clock abnormal duties.
Those people who are targeting important buildings are not from tribal belt but they are our local rebellions who might be part of our ex network of Afghan war.
It might be reaction of report issued from Washington in which clear charges of mass murders of civilian have been put on Pakistan during operation ,

 

LAL QILA

7:49 AM ET

April 7, 2010

Revenge is called badal

Revenge is called badal in Pukhtoonwali honour code; and it is part of parcel of the Pathan culture.

Get used to it or get out of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

SMCI60652

5:39 PM ET

April 8, 2010

So what?

"These colors don't run" is part and parcel of the American creed.

Who cares?

Every testoterone-driven ignoramus culture has some ape-like understanding of how its men are far more "manly" than an other culture's men.

The same "badal" you seem all gloaty about is the same reason why Pashtuns have centuries-old blood libels that they can't seem to transcend and get along long enough to advance their collective state.

You're boasting about an aspect of humanity that your own Prophet condemned.

"They killed so and so from our tribe, so now we have to kill so and so from their tribe, and then they'll kill so and so from our tribe in revenge, and it'll go and on and on."

And on.

It seems your Prophet had an understanding of Pukhtoonwali "honour" code.

He called it Jahiliyya.

 

ALI S

8:48 PM ET

April 7, 2010

Honesty and transparency are very important

Dear Mr. Gul,

During the run up to the Iraq war, the American press and "established" was accused of group think as the purported cause of this massive strategic (not really intelligence) failure.
Reporters for the NYT (eg. Judith Miller) & others routinely wrote articles that were false or misleading to the American public. This led to lack of transparency in our foreign policy, group think, deception, etc... Whatever one may call it - it was a strategic failure and a huge cost in blood & treasure to Americans and Iraqis.

You and other journalists have to be better and more careful about Afghanistan and Karzai. Please do your homework (due diligence) as a professional.

1. Please investigate for your own education and then report for our education why Mr. Peter Galbraith was fired. It is poor journalism to quote a person who has a serious deficiency in credibility ( think Ahmed Chalabi). Mr. Galbraith also demonstrated questionable ethics in Iraq ( his conflct of interest in helping write the Iraq constitution while owning stock worth tens of millions in companies who would benefit from Kurdish oil is as example).

2. Educate yourself about the polling done by the IRI in Afghanistan prior to the election last year. How does one do credible polling in a nation with a 70% illiteracy rate among males, greater than 90% among females, and not much of a telephone system or electricity in the rural areas. How were these "accurate" polls done? What is the IRI? Does it have an agenda? Can it be manipulated?

3. Mr. Karzai has risked his life to be president of Afghanistan. There is no proof, evidence, or data to indicate he is corrupt or doing this for monetary gain. No evidence - curious? His brother is on the CIA payroll and may be corrupt. There is much corruption in this broken and war torn land. But the corruption is no more than Pakistan (Mr. 10% Zardari is the president after all, and the corrupt generals are extraordinary wealthy based on stolen US aid and narcotics).

I could go on, but please consider doing your due diligence on just these 3 points. Reflexive reporting and analysis leads to group think. This leads to bad policy, and this leads to human suffering.
Good Luck. Americans deserve better.

 

LAL QILA

6:07 AM ET

April 8, 2010

Thank you Mr. Ali S

Thank you Mr. Ali S for calling American press to task.

American press is the most unfree/servile press in the West. They are apparently only good a reporting on important information on Paris Hilton and Tiger Woods etc.

For Americans reading these comments my advice is to throw every American "newspaper" into the rubbish bin and start re-eduncating their minds by reading papers like The Guardian, The Economist and various English language newspapers from countries of interest.

Judith Miller was not alone in her propaganda. She had a lot of support from other American pundits on Sunday shows. Many of these are still alive and kicking and apparently their careers have not been affected.

I say, the Group Think, that Americans suffer from continues on.

 

SMCI60652

5:45 PM ET

April 8, 2010

Indeed they are important, but so is relevancy

What exactly in this piece do you take issue with?

All the points you make are completely irrelevant.

The very title of Mr. Gul's piece proclaims that his content is going to be speculative.

He brings forth factual occurences, and puts forward plausible hypotheses as to the motives behind the attacks.

Where did he make any wild, conspiratorial, and/or unsubstantiated claims?