The AFPAK Channel
Inside the war for central asia Twitter Facebook RSS
Daily Brief Latest from the Blog Latest from FP

U.S. intelligence briefing: Taliban increasingly effective

By Peter Bergen Share

A December 22 briefing, prepared by the top U.S. intelligence official in Afghanistan and obtained by CNN, maps out the strategy and strength of the Taliban and their allies in Afghanistan, and concludes that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan is increasingly effective.

The briefing, which warns that the "situation is serious," was prepared by Maj. Gen. Michael Flynn last month. His assessment is that the Taliban's "organizational capabilities and operational reach are qualitatively and geographically expanding" and the group is capable of much greater frequency of attacks and varied locations of attacks.

According to the unclassified briefing, the insurgency can now sustain itself indefinitely because of three factors:

  • The increased availability of bomb-making technology and material;
  • The Taliban's access to two major funding streams, one from the opium trade and the other from overseas donations from Muslim countries, which reach the Taliban by courier or through a system of informal banks known as "hawalas" that operate across much of the Islamic world; and
  • The Taliban's continuing ability to recruit foot soldiers based on the perception that they "retain the religious high-ground," and factors such as poverty and tribal friction.

A chart in Flynn's briefing notes that security incidents -- which include improvised-explosive attacks, ambushes, mortar and missile assaults -- routinely hit 500 a week in the second half of 2009. That compares with a weekly average of no more than 40 five years ago. Even in the generally slower winter fighting season, incidents have not fallen below 300 a week.

To read the rest, visit CNN.com, where this was originally published.

Peter Bergen is the editor of the AfPak Channel, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, and a national security analyst for CNN. 

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JAYDEE001

5:32 PM ET

January 26, 2010

Most discouraging

So - this is the snake-pit we could afford to overlook for eight years while we searched around Iraq for WMD? We had OBL holed up in Tora Bora but could not get out of our own way fast enough to capture or kill the bastard. Now, a too-late 'surge' is the best option we have available to fight an enemy in Afghanistan - whose actually across the border in Pakistan. Osama bin Laden has already won a great victory - he's got us right where he planned to have us. Each report on the status of our efferts in 'AfPak' gets a little less optimistic than the last one.

We can kill all the Islamic warriors we can find, and they will just recruit more. We are likely to run out of bullets and money to buy them with before they run out of troops. And they can do all this with hard cash from drugs and - presumably - the pennies donated by muslim children from their lunch money throughout the muslim world! At the same time, we have to borrow from China, so our own people won't have to endure the pain of actually paying for the wars fought in their name. They should just go to the mall and let our corporatist-military-industrialist government worry about keeping the terrorists away at night. Don't worry, be happy - they send us the bill next generation.

This now looks like another case of stacking and counting the bodies while the land around burns more fiercely. Anyone alive during the 60s and early seventies will appreciate the reference. Yep - we've stumbled into another quagmire folks, and this one is a slough of our own making, principally. This is going to turn out badly, for sure. It's enough to make a grown man cry. Sorry for the sarcasm.

 

SOULCASE

12:25 PM ET

January 27, 2010

Thanks guys

Another awesome intel analyst product. The Taliban are getting better? I'm glad we figured that out!