Friday, December 4, 2009 - 8:53 AM
A bloody coordinated attack
At
least 40 people have been killed at a crowded mosque in several
apparently coordinated suicide attacks in the Qasim market area of the
Pakistani garrison town Rawalpindi, the country's military headquarters
(BBC, AP, CNN, Geo TV, Dawn, NYT, Reuters, The News, AFP).
Initial reports suggest that multiple attackers sneaked into the mosque
disguised as worshipers and then hurled grenades, exploded suicide
bombs, and opened fire at worshipers, who were mostly military
officers, during Friday prayers; Pakistan's military apparatus is a
frequent target of Taliban militants, though this attack has not yet
been claimed.
Pakistan's military is currently engaged in a
nearly seven-week-old offensive in the Taliban-infested tribal region
of South Waziristan, though operations have been carried out in nearby
tribal agencies as well; most recently, two Taliban 'commanders' were
reportedly among 20 militants killed in air strikes and gun battles in
Swat and Orakzai (Dawn). And an anti-tank bomb exploded underneath a minibus in Mohmand agency, killing at least three members of a wedding party (Dawn). The AP has compiled a list of major militant attacks in Pakistan since the beginning of October (AP).
Pakistan's
Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani continues to deny that Osama bin
Laden is in Pakistan, and a Taliban detainee in Pakistan reportedly
claims he has a friend who saw the al Qaeda leader in the eastern
Afghan province of Ghazni in early 2009, though there is no independent
corroboration available (Times of London, BBC).
Today's essential reading
Scott
Shane has today's must-read describing the possible expansion of the
CIA's controversial program of firing missiles from Predator drones at
militant targets in Pakistan (NYT).
Though all of the drone attacks to date have occurred in Pakistan's
troubled border areas, U.S. officials are reportedly in talks with
Pakistan to strike targets in Baluchistan, where the Afghan Taliban is
headquartered, for the first time, a move that would surely spark
outrage in the country.
7,000 NATO soldiers
NATO
Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen announced earlier this morning
that 25 member countries of the alliance will send 7,000 new troops to
Afghanistan in 2010, as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived
in Brussels for a NATO defense ministers meeting to drum up support for
U.S. President Barack Obama's recently announced troop surge to
Afghanistan (NYT, Times of London, Wash Post, AP, BBC, Reuters). Clinton has an opinion piece in the Telegraph today encouraging allied countries to participate in the renewed war effort (Telegraph).
Germany's parliament just voted to extend the country's 4,500-soldier
mission in Afghanistan, though it has not pledged new troops (FT).
And
U.S. Marines and Afghan troops have launched the first offensive since
Obama's speech earlier this week, aimed at cutting off Taliban
communication routes and supply lines in northern Helmand province (AP).
No casualties have been reported yet. Additionally, Afghanistan's
western Herat airport was hit by rocket attacks by suspected Taliban
militants earlier today, causing a temporary closure of the airstrip
but no casualties (Dawn).
Seeking clarity
Congress
continued to pound Obama's advisers on Capitol Hill yesterday yesterday
for more details about the president's troop surge and the July 2011
timeline, when the U.S. plans to begin to transition security authority
to Afghans, as Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that the eventual
drawdown would "probably" take two to three years but would be
determined by conditions on the ground at the time (NYT, McClatchy, Wash Post).
Meanwhile, the Pentagon acknowledged that not all of the 30,000 new
troops will make it to the Afghan theater by the end of the summer of
2010, as previously stated, but a senior military official said the
last brigade will probably arrive in early fall.
Congressional
leaders also pressed Gates, Clinton, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
Adm. Mike Mullen about whether the U.S. is too focused on Afghanistan
and not enough on neighboring Pakistan, and on specific plans to
address the pervasive corruption in the Afghan government (AP, Reuters, CNN).
Obama's decision to send more troops is straining his ties with the
Democratic base, though Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said
yesterday that she does not support a proposal that would add a "war
tax" to fund the additional troops (NYT, AP, Wash Post).
Obama was reportedly behind the decision to make the
July 2011 date part of his public address, which has become the most
controversial part of the new strategy (LAT).
Gates, though originally opposed, came around when convinced, partly by
CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, that the pace of the drawdown
would be based on ground conditions.
Afghan
President Hamid Karzai has publicly come out in support of the troop
increase, saying that he will "spare no effort" in helping implement
the new strategy, and he is reportedly expected to replace up to 21 of
his 26 cabinet ministers in an attempt to combat corruption (LAT, Globe and Mail, AP).
A critical part of dealing with the Taliban insurgency is convincing
militants to lay down their arms, and Karzai told the AP he would enter
talks with the Afghan Taliban's leader, Mullah Omar, apparently without
any preconditions -- an offer which is likely to be rejected, again (AP, Pajhwok).
Back in court
Najibullah
Zazi, the Afghan-American onetime coffee cart vender accused of
plotting to detonate explosives in New York around the anniversary of
September 11, will likely face more charges, though he is not expected
to face trial until at least next fall due to the mountains of evidence
involved in his case (LAT, Bloomberg, NYT, CNN, AP). Zazi was in court in New York yesterday for a 15-minute pre-trial hearing.
Soft and fluffy
Cotton
production in Afghanistan's eastern Nangarhar province has more than
doubled in the past year as a result of farmers using higher quality
seeds and receiving better training (Pajhwok). The water and mud in several of Nangarhar's districts is ideal for growing cotton, according to Afghan authorities.
Sign up here to receive the daily brief in your inbox.
FAROOQ NAEEM/AFP/Getty Images
This can not be done without the help of RAW and its agents in Pakistan.
India seeems spending hell of lot of money and working vey very hard to destroy Pakistan and killing innocent people and children by all means and resources.
If we want to win against militants, world must stop India to fund and support militants in Pakistan otherwise it is impossible to get Pakistn onboard.
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE