Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
AfPak on ForeignPolicy.com
Daily brief: 15 dead in two Peshawar suicide attacks in last day
Event notice: TODAY at
12pm Stephen Biddle, Gilles Dorronsoro, Peter Bergen, and Jessica T.
Mathews will be discussing the U.S.'s strategy in Afghanistan at the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Details and RSVP available here.
More or less
U.S.
President Barack Obama is reportedly moving closer to making a decision
about the way forward in Afghanistan, as his advisers are preparing
three options to escalate the United States' efforts in the country,
all of which require between 20,000 and 40,000 more troops (New York Times).
Speculation about Obama's decision has been rife in Washington and
abroad over the past several weeks, and the latest round asserts that
the president is leaning toward sending some 30,000 more soldiers to
Afghanistan (McClatchy, Independent).
U.S.
National Security Adviser Gen. Jim Jones cautioned that Afghanistan
could "swallow up" more troops sent to the country, and emphasized that
solutions are not reached with soldiers alone (Der Spiegel, Telegraph, AFP). U.S. Army chief of staff Gen. George Casey told Meet the Press yesterday that more troops are needed in Afghanistan (Wall Street Journal, Reuters, MSNBC).
And some Afghans are reportedly having serious doubts about whether
more U.S. troops would help the country; nearly everyone interviewed
advocated that instead of sending more international troops, the U.S.
should boost Afghan security forces (New York Times).
Security in Afghanistan
Afghan
and U.S. authorities are investigating whether a possible friendly fire
incident in Badghis province on Friday caused the deaths of Afghan
soldiers and police during a search operation for two missing U.S.
soldiers (AP, Financial Times, BBC, Washington Post).
Coalition forces are engaged in heavy fighting in both Badghis and
Kunduz, two once-peaceful northern provinces overseen by European
contingents of NATO where militant activity has recently surged (Wall Street Journal, Reuters).
Helmand
province, in Afghanistan's restive south, seems to have improved
security conditions following thousands of additional U.S. troops
deployed there this summer, though local residents are wary that the
troops may leave the rural insurgent heartland for the Taliban to
recapture (Los Angeles Times).
Also in southern Afghanistan, Afghan justice officials are
investigating claims that Taliban prisoners in Kandahar are on a hunger
strike to protest bad food, water, and health care (AP).
And several supply trucks in northern and eastern Afghanistan were set
on fire by Taliban militants on Sunday afternoon, highlighting the
challenges of supporting the war effort (AP, Pajhwok, AP).
Corruption, corruption everywhere
Afghanistan's
newly re-elected and embattled President Hamid Karzai told PBS's
Margaret Warner that corrupt individuals will have no place in his
government, but placed some of the blame for Afghanistan's pervasive
corruption on international donors, claiming a "lack of transparency in
the award of contracts," "no accountability of their contracts," and
"serious corruption in implementing projects" (PBS, AP, Pajhwok, Wall Street Journal). Karzai's reputation in Afghanistan was badly sullied by the fraud-riddled presidential election in August.
A city under siege
Two
suicide attacks have struck the troubled northwestern Pakistani city of
Peshawar in the last 24 hours; earlier this morning, a suicide bomber
detonated explosives in his rickshaw after being stopped at a police
checkpoint on the road surrounding the city, killing at least three (AFP, AP, BBC, Geo TV, Reuters).
Another blast in a Peshawar cattle market yesterday killed 12,
including a local mayor who was allied with the Taliban until about two
years ago, when he broke with the militant group over the targeting of
civilians (CNN, Dawn, Bloomberg, Al Jazeera, AP, BBC, The News).
The attack seems to be part of a Taliban campaign to stem grassroots
opposition to the movement, and the mayor Abdul Malik was reportedly
targeted before (New York Times, The News, Wall Street Journal).
But
when another suicide attack on a bazaar in Peshawar last week killed
more than 100 people, mostly women and children, Pakistanis were
incredulous that their fellow Muslims could carry out such atrocities (Washington Post).
Most of the anger from survivors, witnesses, religious leaders, and
residents was directed not at the Taliban, but at India, Israel, and
the United States.
Payback
The
series of militant attacks that has plagued Peshawar and the rest of
Pakistan is an apparent retaliation for ongoing Pakistani military
operations in South Waziristan, a Taliban stronghold on the Afghan
border, which according to the military have killed nearly 500
militants since the offensive began in mid-October (AFP).
Pakistan's Army is reportedly struggling to come up with clear
post-offensive plans to run and rebuild the mountainous tribal region,
and in today's essential reading, Alex Rodriguez examines the complex
relationships between the Taliban in Waziristan and the Mehsud
tribesmen who live there (AP, Los Angeles Times).
And
in the face of increased Predator drone strikes targeting militant
hideouts in the tribal regions, al Qaeda is relying more heavily on
local insurgent groups to house smaller, more mobile training camps for
recruits (AP).
Counterterrorism officials estimate that between 100 and 150 Westerners
have traveled to Pakistan's tribal regions to receive training from the
"dozens" of camps there in the last year.
Nuclear insecurity?
Veteran investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has a must-read in the new New Yorker
reporting that the Obama administration has been involved in "highly
sensitive" negotiations with the Pakistani Army that would "allow
specially trained American units to provide added security for the
Pakistani arsenal in case of a crisis" with Pakistan's nuclear arsenal (New Yorker). Pakistani military officials have angrily defended the security of the country's nuclear weapons (CNN, Al Jazeera).
No standard gold
Traditionally
opulent Pakistani weddings are losing some of their luster this year
because of the rising price of gold and other essentials in a country
shadowed by Taliban attacks (AFP). Matrimonial ceremonies can span 3 to 5 days and attract as many as 1,000 celebrants.
Sign up here to receive the daily brief in your inbox.









