An articulate plan for security

By Asma Nemati Share

By Asma Nemati

It's about time the Obama administration focused on what's necessary for Afghanistan: security. With Hamid Karzai's presidency renewed, the U.S. has another chance to show the world community, and -- more importantly -- U.S. citizens, that there's still hope for Afghanistan and that the Obama administration is serious about tackling down major problems. But, what are these problems? What's the reality on the ground?

As someone who talks to many Afghans -- from government officials to shopkeepers, students and others -- and the international community on a daily basis, the answer is very clear: Afghans need security and stability before anything else can be put forth. In the past, there have been several problems with providing an adequate strategy to tackle this problem, most of which have led to the Taliban winning back major parts of the country. However, this cannot be tolerated anymore, neither by the Afghans nor the international community that's here to help.

In terms of security, more troops are fundamental. But this has to be spelled out clearly by the Obama administration. When speaking to Afghans here, they agree that more troops are needed, but an entire plan is also needed to know when the troops will arrive, where they will be deployed, what will they carry out, and -- this is what concerns Afghans a lot -- when they will be leaving. The what part is the most important one; Afghans here agree that more troops are necessary to support Afghanistan's own security forces, the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police.

Among the increased number of troops, Afghanistan needs many experts to train and coach Afghans in security-related issues. Not only will this involve Afghans in rebuilding their own country, but it will also enable them to see results coming from their work. This will also allow a realistic timetable for U.S. forces to leave: as soon as effective and transparent outcomes are seen.

Moreover, focus needs to be placed on clearing out Taliban strongholds in the border region of Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Taliban are gaining numbers and sympathizers in what has become a recurring nightmare that Afghanistan and the world community only woke up from nine years ago. We cannot afford to wait any longer and let the area be run by thugs who have absolutely no respect for humanity, let alone themselves and their countrymen.

Asma Nemati, a researcher from Kabul, is an instructor at the American University of Afghanistan.

 
Facebook|Twitter|Digg
About Us The Blog Contributors Archive

Is Operation Moshtarak a fool’s mission?

BY NORINE MACDONALD | FEB. 8, 2010

We should be asking some critical questions about the now, much-publicized NATO and Afghan forces operation to take Marjah district in Helmand. For starters: How does this operation fit into the overall strategy for Afghanistan -- why Marjah and why now?

Read Entire Entry

A London fog on Afghanistan

BY GILLES DORRONSORO | FEB. 5, 2010

In restive provinces like Helmand and Kandahar, rallying the foot soldiers of the insurgency is simply never going to work, because they are fighting in defense of values -- such as Islam, and freedom from foreign occupation -- that they see under attack. Even if the coalition achieves limited tactical successes, the Taliban will quickly replace the fighters it loses, and it can easily target the "traitors." These coalition tactics are not new and have never worked before. Why does the White House think they'll work now, with the insurgency stronger than ever?

Read Entire Entry

In Dostum's Debt

BY BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS | FEB. 4, 2010

When the Karzai government announced last week that it would be reinstating Abdul Rashid Dostum, the controversial Uzbek general, as Chief of Staff of the Army, the cries of foul and protest rang loud. But, when it comes to Afghan politics there is usually more than meets the eye, and Dostum's case is no exception. As usual in Afghanistan it involves some back-room deals.

Read Entire Entry

The Devil is in the Details

BY NORINE MACDONALD | FEB. 2, 2010

During last week's London conference, President Karzai unveiled a six-point "Action Plan" designed to turn around the situation in Afghanistan. But how much "action" is really behind the political façade of his six-point plan?

Read Entire Entry

Karzai's Taliban Surprise

BY J ALEXANDER THIER | JAN. 29, 2010

The Afghanistan Conference in London this week was expected to be a just one more in a series of international talk-fests intended as a show of international solidarity with Afghanistan. But Karzai took things a step further -- and took his hosts by surprise -- by using his speech to call for high level negotiations with the Taliban leadership that would result in permanent political reconciliation. Karzai has opened this door repeatedly before, and there have been several attempts to engage Taliban leaders seriously in talks.

Read Entire Entry

Dead Aid for Afghanistan?

BY GERARD RUSSELL | JAN. 27, 2010

Dependence cannot be ended overnight. But President Karzai’s circle is wrong to suppose that it can continue forever. It is far better, for Afghanistan’s long-term future, that they learn this sooner rather than later.

Read Entire Entry

Peter Bergen's Take

U.S. intelligence briefing: Taliban increasingly effective

BY PETER BERGEN | JAN. 26, 2010

A December 22 briefing, prepared by the top U.S. intelligence official in Afghanistan and obtained by CNN, maps out the strategy and strength of the Taliban and their allies in Afghanistan, and concludes that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan is increasingly effective.

Read Entire Entry

Images from the most-talked about place of 2009.

A primer on the epicenter of global terrorism.
By Peter Bergen and Katherine Tiedemann

A guide to the most critical readings on Afghanistan and Pakistan.