Kudos for Karzai and smiles all around

By Jean MacKenzie Share

By Jean MacKenzie

It was not so much the announcement itself that was shocking as the manner of its presentation.

When Afghan President Hamid Karzai stood at a podium on Tuesday afternoon to announce that Afghanistan would hold a runoff election between himself and Dr. Abdullah Abdullah on Nov. 7, he was flanked by three ambassadors, one U.S. senator, and the U.N. special representative.

"It was like some sort of political love-in for Karzai," said one international election observer, speaking privately.

At the very least, it was an overwhelming demonstration of support for a president who had for days stood "like a brick wall," as one diplomat put it, in the way of holding a second round of elections. Several days of fevered negotiations were required before Karzai backed down and agreed to accept the legally mandated decisions of the election oversight bodies.

This earned him plaudits and kudos from a host of international actors, including U.S. President Barack Obama, who sent Karzai a letter commending him for his decision.

"[President Karzai] showed statesmanship by deciding to move forward, embracing the Constitution and the rule of law," said U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.).

The Afghan president stopped a bit short of that lofty goal, however. In the hour that he stood on the dais, Karzai never once uttered the word "fraud," or acknowledged in any way that he was not the outright victor in the first round of elections on Aug. 20. Preliminary results gave him nearly 55 percent of the vote, to 28 percent for Abdullah.

"I will leave it to the Afghan people ... to decide whether or not I was the winner," he said.

But it was the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) that robbed him of his coveted victory, by ordering the Independent Election Commission (IEC) to disqualify almost one-third of the votes cast for Karzai.

The IEC could barely conceal its consternation at having to order a second round.

"His Excellency Hamed Karzai has received 49.67 percent of the total valid vote and is recognized as the leading candidate," said the press release. "Although the IEC has some reservations regarding the decisions of the ECC, considering time constraints, the imminent arrival of winter and existence of problems in the country, the IEC announces that the second round of elections will be held on Nov. 7."

To the end, Karzai maintained that the reports of widespread ballot-box tampering were nothing more than "defamation of the Afghan elections."

We have been told that 1.3 million votes were "suspicious" most of which -- more than one million -- were in the south," he said, subtly playing the ethnic card. The south is dominated by Pashtuns, his main base of support. "We should investigate deeply why these votes have been disrespected."

Karzai justified his willingness to accede to a second round as a selfless desire to put the interests of his country ahead of his own.

But judging from the smiling faces surrounding him on Tuesday, he got more than a warm glow from agreeing to the runoff. He got the unquestioned and open support of the international community. Ambassadors from the United States, the United Kingdom, and France joined Kerry and U.N. Special Representative Kai Eide in showing the world that this time, there would be no mistakes.

"I look forward to a dignified campaign and a fair result," said Eide, smiling broadly at Karzai.

Eide has been under pressure for weeks, amid mounting evidence of fraud in the first round. The U.N. special representative was a champion of the "process" and staunchly defended the IEC even as the latter openly flouted its own rules and included suspicious ballot boxes in Karzai's totals. Eide's deputy, Peter Galbraith, was more outspoken about allegations of malfeasance, which got him sacked and led to a very public, and extremely damaging, assault on the UN's credibility and impartiality in the election.

Now the country is braced for a second round, in just over two weeks. It will be very nearly impossible to organize a valid vote in that time, given Afghanistan's geography, security problems and the general anger and disaffection of the population.

"The second round may well be worse than the first," said one election expert, speaking on condition of anonymity. "There will be very few international observers, the security could be worse, and the turnout will probably be miniscule."

In August, barely 30 percent of registered voters made it to the polls. In November, that number is likely to plummet.

"Why should anyone care about these elections?" grumbled one young doctor in Kabul. "It will be the international community who decides what will happen next."

Gazing at the faces around Karzai on Tuesday afternoon, this may not be far from the truth.

Paula Bronstein /Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Digg

KUNINO

7:00 PM ET

October 20, 2009

Kudos?

That was no love-in. Most viewers would interpret it as a show of force by a pack of foreigners and Karzai as the local guy who submitted to it.

 

THETRAJECTORY

10:08 AM ET

October 21, 2009

The Runoff Drama

The runoff is likely to return Hamid Karzai to power with a key portfolio for Abdullah Abdullah. Such a result would satisfy all major stakeholders of the Presidential elections. Hamid Karzai’s assertion that the charges of election fraud were exaggerated and that he is still the most popular leader would be validated. Abdullah Abdullah’s involvement would serve as an inside check on Karzai’s government and please the Tajik population. The international community will able to bask in the glory of ensuring a truly representative government in Afghanistan. The only (and according to me the most vital) stakeholder to loose in the entire process will be the Afghan people. The Afghans may be illiterate but are cannot be fooled into buying a manufactured power-sharing deal as a manifestation of popular will.
http://thetrajectory.com/blogs/?p=872

 
About Us The Blog Contributors Archive

Is Operation Moshtarak a fool’s mission?

BY NORINE MACDONALD | FEB. 8, 2010

We should be asking some critical questions about the now, much-publicized NATO and Afghan forces operation to take Marjah district in Helmand. For starters: How does this operation fit into the overall strategy for Afghanistan -- why Marjah and why now?

Read Entire Entry

A London fog on Afghanistan

BY GILLES DORRONSORO | FEB. 5, 2010

In restive provinces like Helmand and Kandahar, rallying the foot soldiers of the insurgency is simply never going to work, because they are fighting in defense of values -- such as Islam, and freedom from foreign occupation -- that they see under attack. Even if the coalition achieves limited tactical successes, the Taliban will quickly replace the fighters it loses, and it can easily target the "traitors." These coalition tactics are not new and have never worked before. Why does the White House think they'll work now, with the insurgency stronger than ever?

Read Entire Entry

In Dostum's Debt

BY BRIAN GLYN WILLIAMS | FEB. 4, 2010

When the Karzai government announced last week that it would be reinstating Abdul Rashid Dostum, the controversial Uzbek general, as Chief of Staff of the Army, the cries of foul and protest rang loud. But, when it comes to Afghan politics there is usually more than meets the eye, and Dostum's case is no exception. As usual in Afghanistan it involves some back-room deals.

Read Entire Entry

The Devil is in the Details

BY NORINE MACDONALD | FEB. 2, 2010

During last week's London conference, President Karzai unveiled a six-point "Action Plan" designed to turn around the situation in Afghanistan. But how much "action" is really behind the political façade of his six-point plan?

Read Entire Entry

Karzai's Taliban Surprise

BY J ALEXANDER THIER | JAN. 29, 2010

The Afghanistan Conference in London this week was expected to be a just one more in a series of international talk-fests intended as a show of international solidarity with Afghanistan. But Karzai took things a step further -- and took his hosts by surprise -- by using his speech to call for high level negotiations with the Taliban leadership that would result in permanent political reconciliation. Karzai has opened this door repeatedly before, and there have been several attempts to engage Taliban leaders seriously in talks.

Read Entire Entry

Dead Aid for Afghanistan?

BY GERARD RUSSELL | JAN. 27, 2010

Dependence cannot be ended overnight. But President Karzai’s circle is wrong to suppose that it can continue forever. It is far better, for Afghanistan’s long-term future, that they learn this sooner rather than later.

Read Entire Entry

Peter Bergen's Take

U.S. intelligence briefing: Taliban increasingly effective

BY PETER BERGEN | JAN. 26, 2010

A December 22 briefing, prepared by the top U.S. intelligence official in Afghanistan and obtained by CNN, maps out the strategy and strength of the Taliban and their allies in Afghanistan, and concludes that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan is increasingly effective.

Read Entire Entry

Images from the most-talked about place of 2009.

A primer on the epicenter of global terrorism.
By Peter Bergen and Katherine Tiedemann

A guide to the most critical readings on Afghanistan and Pakistan.